Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who Supports Local Growth and Regional Planning to Deal with Its Consequences

Bibliographic Data

ID6404729
AuthorsRobert W Wassmer (0000-0001-5237-6534), Edward L Lascher (0009-0000-8793-4591, California State University, Sacramento)
Year2006
Volume41
Issue5
Pages621-645
Publication date2006-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Affairs Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1078087405285022
OpenAlexW2064741272
LanguageEN
Citations received15
References cited24

Using 1989 and 2002 California survey data, this article offers a multivariate statistical analysis of factors that determine individual support for further growth in one's county as well as support for regional coordination of local land-use decisions. Women and residents of higher per capita income counties were more likely to believe that their county had reached its growth limit. In 2002 we also found that aging changes one's opinion on this issue. Additionally, people who believed “sprawl” to be a very important issue in their region in 2002 were more likely to favor a state mandate requiring the regional coordination of local land uses

Demographic economics · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Land use · Local planning · Mandate · Multivariate analysis · Per capita · Political science · Population · Regional science · Smart growth · Sociology · Subdivision · Urban sprawl · Demography · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • Public Opinion and Affordable Housing

    Open Access•J Rosie Tighe•Journal of Planning Literature•2010

  • The Efficacy of Allocating Housing Growth in the Los Angeles Region (2006–2014)

    Open Access•Darrel Ramsey-Musolf•Urban Science•2020

  • Planning for Sustainability in Small Municipalities

    Open Access•Vanessa R Levesque, Kathleen P Bell et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2016

  • Voters’ Acceptance of Land Use Policy Measures

    Open Access•Lyn Ellen Pleger•Land Use Policy•2017

  • Implementing regional smart growth without regional authority

    Open Access•Gian-Claudia Sciara•Cities•2020

  • An examination of early New Urbanist developments in the United States

    Open Access•Yan Song, Mark R Stevens et al.•Cities•2017

  • Prospects for Expanding Regional Planning Efforts in Michigan

    Open Access•Elisabeth R Gerber, Carolyn G Loh•Urban Studies•2011

  • Who Would Pay for Rural Open Space Preservation and Inner-city Redevelopment? Identifying Support for Policies that Can Contribute to Regional Land Use Governance

    Open Access•Rayman Mohamed•Urban Studies•2008

  • Explaining Smart Growth Applications

    Open Access•Amal K Ali•Urban Studies•2014

  • Competing interests and the political market for smart growth policy

    Open Access•Christopher V Hawkins, Christopher Hawkins•Urban Studies•2014

  • Exploring the Social Roots of Smart Growth Policy Adoption by Cities

    Open Access•Lenahan O’connell, Lenahan O'Connell•Social Science Quarterly•2008

  • Public Support for the “Regional Perspective

    Open Access•Michael Leo Owens•Urban Affairs Review•2010

  • Local Political Institutions and Smart Growth

    Open Access•Edgar E Ramírez De La Cruz•Urban Affairs Review•2009

  • Smart Growth at the Ballot Box

    Open Access•Shanna Pearson-Merkowitz, Corey Lang•Urban Affairs Review•2020

  • Is Open-Space Preservation a Form of Exclusionary Zoning

    Open Access•Stephan Schmidt, Kurt Paulsen•Urban Affairs Review•2009

  • Logistic Regression

    F C Pampel, Fred Pampel•Logistic Regression•2000

  • Some realities about sprawl and urban decline

    Anthony Downs, Anthony J Downs•Housing Policy Debate•1999

  • Is Los Angeles-Style Sprawl Desirable?

    Reid Ewing•Journal of the American Planning…•1997

  • The Initiative and Referendum in California, 1898-1998

    Roger W Lotchin, John M Allswang•Journal of American History•2001

  • Growth Policies and Community Status

    Open Access•William Protash, Mark Baldassare•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1983

  • Constituencies for Limitation and Regionalism

    Open Access•Scott A Bollens•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1990

  • Constituency of the Antigrowth Movement

    Open Access•Don E Albrecht, Gordon L Bultena et al.•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1986

  • Characteristics of Support for Local Growth Control

    Open Access•Mark Gottdiener, Max Neiman•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1981

  • Predicting Local Concern about Growth

    Mark Baldassare•Journal of Urban Affairs•1984

  • The Initiative and Referendum in California

    Vincent Ostrom, Winston W Crouch•The Western Political Quarterly•1951

  • Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Slow Growth and Urban Sprawl

    Open Access•Juliet F Gainsborough•Urban Affairs Review•2002

  • Macropartisanship in California

    John L Korey•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  • The Changing Politics of American Men

    Karen M Kaufmann, John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1999

  • Are Compact Cities a Desirable Planning Goal

    Peter Gordon, Herbert W Richardson et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•1997

  • Growth Controls, Population Growth, and Community Satisfaction

    Mark Baldassare, William Protash•American Sociological Review•1982

  • Politics and Environment in America

    Riley E Dunlap, Chenyang Xiao et al.•Environmental Politics•2001

Citations per year0.83
Citation span2008 - 2020 (13)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae