Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Roles and Motivations of Planning Professionals Who Promote Public Participation in Urban Planning Practice

Two Case Studies from Beijing, China

Bibliographic Data

ID6404786
AuthorsLin Zhang (0000-0001-5966-3827, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, corresponding author), Pieter Hooimeijer (0000-0001-5072-6481, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands), Yanliu Lin (0000-0001-7015-1443, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands), Stan Geertman (0000-0002-8824-0484, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands)
Year2020
Volume56
Issue4
Pages1237-1262
Publication date2020-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Affairs Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1078087419895116
OpenAlexW2995833107
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited51

Public participation in urban planning is a contested issue in China. In this article, we look at the endogenous mechanism of institutional change, by analyzing the roles and motivations of “third-party” planning professionals in two contrasting cases: a government-led and a citizen-led participatory practice. Findings show that planners were advocates of citizen participation in heritage preservation in both cases and acted as “mediators” in the first and “activists” in the second, yet remained within the mainstream planning structure. Their motivation to serve the rights of the citizens was clear, but subordinate to the drive to conform to the professional norms of authenticity in preservation in both cases. In contrast to both the Global North where more agonistic approaches question inclusive planning and the Global South where insurgent planning finds space to maneuver, Chinese urban planning seems to proceed by taking small steps within narrow margins when it comes to citizen engagement

Beijing · China · Citizen journalism · Economic growth · Economics · Government (linguistics · Mainstream · Participatory planning · Political science · Politics · Public participation · Public relations · Right to the city · Sociology · Urban planning · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Law · Public Administration · Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies · Urban Planning and Governance

  • Mobilizing spatial capital through planner-mediated exploratory walks

    Open Access•Shiyang Chen, Tong Sheng et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2025

  • A spatiotemporal-commons approach

    Open Access•Shuwen Sailer-Zhou•Planning Practice and Research•2026

  • How does layperson knowledge shape willingness to participate? Evidence from urban neighborhood renewal in China

    Open Access•Guodong Ma, Ziyang Long et al.•Habitat International•2026

  • Beyond rationality

    Open Access•Minji Cho•International Planning Studies•2026

  • Engaging stakeholders in contested urban heritage planning and management

    Open Access•Yang Liu, Xin Jin et al.•Cities•2022

  • Reimagining Public Participation in Urban Development

    Open Access•Katrin Hofer•Urban Affairs Review•2025

  • The role of local officials in promoting public participation during local urban planning processes

    Open Access•Haiyun Xu, Miao Meng et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • State-led versus market-led

    Open Access•Xiang Li, Bin Li et al.•Habitat International•2024

  • In search of open and inclusive arenas

    Open Access•Chuan Wang, Yifan Wang•Habitat International•2020

  • Insisting on not being addressed in that way

    Open Access•Sabrina Schröder, Markus Leibenath•Planning Theory•2024

  • From Rational Planning to Communicative Planning

    Lei Zhang, Jinghui Lu et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2025

  • The communicative turn in planning? Examining community planner's role as a third actor in Beijing, China

    Open Access•Zhen Li, Yanliu Lin et al.•Cities•2025

  • Multi-scenario urban growth boundaries and trade-offs among land use functions

    Open Access•Jingxian Wei, Wenze Yue et al.•Cities•2025

  • Collaborative Planning

    Open Access•Patsy Healey•Collaborative Planning•1997

  • Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation

    Shazia Jamshed•Journal of Basic and Clinical…•2014

  • Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems

    Judith E Innes, David E Booher•Journal of the American Planning…•1999

  • Planning In the Face of Conflict

    John Forester•Journal of the American Planning…•1987

  • Making Plans that Matter

    Raymond J Burby•Journal of the American Planning…•2003

  • Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning

    Paul Davidoff•Journal of the American Institute…•1965

  • Recapturing Democracy

    Mark Purcell•Recapturing Democracy•2008

  • The Logic of Collective Action

    Mancur Olson•Logic of Collective Action•1965

  • Naked City

    Sharon Zukin•Naked city•2010

  • Understanding public participation in forest planning

    Open Access•Marlene Buchy, Suzanne Hoverman•Forest Policy and Economics•2000

  • Relational Rewards and Communicative Planning

    Open Access•Amy Rader Olsson•Planning Theory•2009

  • Collaborative planning in the network

    Open Access•Yao Cheng•Planning Theory•2013

  • Who participates, who does not, and why? An analysis of voluntary neighborhood organizations in the United States and Israel

    Open Access•Abraham Wandersman, Paul Florin et al.•Sociological Forum•1987

  • Challenges Facing Chinese Planners in Transitional China

    Open Access•Tingwei Zhang•Journal of Planning Education and…•2002

  • Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers

    Open Access•Hal G Rainey•The American Review of Public…•1982

  • Authenticity as a challenge in the transformation of Beijing's urban heritage

    Open Access•Plácido González Martínez•Cities•2016

  • Why city-region planning does not work well in China

    Open Access•Xiaolong Luo, Jianfa Shen•Cities•2008

  • Collaborative planning in the new media age

    Open Access•Zhaohua Deng, Yanliu Lin et al.•Cities•2015

  • Urban conservation and revalorisation of dilapidated historic quarters

    Open Access•Hyun Bang Shin•Cities•2010

  • Urban regeneration and social capital in China

    Open Access•Binqing Zhai, Mee Kam Ng•Cities•2013

  • Communicative turn’ in Chinese spatial planning? Exploring possibilities in Chinese contexts

    Open Access•Yingjie Hu, Gert De Roo et al.•Cities•2013

  • Preservation of old towns in Norway

    Open Access•Torill Nyseth, Johanne Sognnæs•Cities•2013

  • Planning activism

    Open Access•Ali Tayebi•Cities•2013

  • The impact of urbanization policy on land use change

    Open Access•Yuzhe Wu, Zezhou Wu et al.•Cities•2011

  • Facilitating generation of local knowledge using a collaborative initiator

    Open Access•Yi Sun•Habitat International•2015

  • Struggling for an adaptive strategy? Discourse analysis of urban regeneration processes – A case study of Enning Road in Guangzhou City

    Open Access•Xiaohong Tan, Uwe Altrock•Habitat International•2016

  • Visual preference dimensions of historic urban areas

    Open Access•Meysam Deghati Najd, Nor Atiah Ismail et al.•Habitat International•2015

  • China's Emerging Neoliberal Urbanism

    Open Access•Shenjing He, Fulong Wu•Antipode•2009

  • Heterogeneity of public participation in urban redevelopment in Chinese cities

    Open Access•Lin Zhang, Yanliu Lin et al.•Urban Studies•2020

  • Land Use Planning and the Mediation of Urban Change; The British Planning System in Practice

    George R Hughes, George Hughes et al.•Transactions of the Institute of…•1990

  • Strategies of the built-heritage stewardship movement in urban redevelopment in the Internet Age

    Open Access•Lin Zhang, Pieter Hooimeijer et al.•Geoforum•2019

  • Investigating the Structure and Meaning of Public Service Motivation across Populations

    Sangmook Kim, Wouter Vandenabeele et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • Local Politics, Organized Interests, and Land-Use Policy

    Open Access•Eric Heberlig, Eric S Heberlig et al.•Urban Affairs Review•2014

  • The Motivational Bases of Public Service

    James L Perry, Lois Recascino Wise•Public Administration Review•1990

  • Measuring Public Service Motivation

    Jay L Perry•Journal of Public Administration…•1996

  • Beyond Engagement and Participation

    Open Access•T Bovaird•Public Administration Review•2007

  • New Directions in Planning Theory

    Susan S Fainstein, Fainstein•Urban Affairs Review•2000

  • Planning through debate

    Patsy Healey•Town Planning Review•1992

  • Finding Common Ground

    Open Access•Lynne C Manzo, Douglas D Perkins•Journal of Planning Literature•2006

  • The qualitative research interview

    Open Access•Barbara Dicicco-Bloom, Barbara DiCicco‐Bloom et al.•Medical Education•2006

  • Insurgent Planning

    Open Access•Faranak Miraftab•Planning Theory•2009

  • Incentives in Collective Action Organizations

    David Knoke•American Sociological Review•1988

  • Anti-incinerator campaigns and the evolution of protest politics in China

    Graeme Lang, Ying Xu•Environmental Politics•2013

  • Historicizing Planning, Problematizing Participation

    Open Access•Margo Huxley•International Journal of Urban…•2013

  • The "Third Spring" of Urban Planning in China

    Open Access•Michael Leaf, Li Hou•China Information•2006

  • Professionals and field-level change

    Open Access•Roy Suddaby, Thierry Viale•Current Sociology•2011

Unique citing works13
Citations per year2,17
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae