When Cities Get Married

Constructing Urban Space through Gender, Sexuality, and Municipal Consolidation

Bibliographic Data

ID6404911
AuthorsRichardson Dilworth (0009-0007-3039-2315, Drexel University), Kathryn Trevenen (University of Ottawa)
Year2004
Volume40
Issue2
Pages183-209
Publication date2004-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueUrban Affairs Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1078087404269537
OpenAlexW2044464911
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited29

In this article, we examine the processes by which urban space became sexually coded through municipal consolidation in the nineteenth century. Our analysis covers the union of Van Vorst Township to Jersey City in 1851 and the absorption of the City of Brooklyn to “Greater New York” in 1898. In both cases, urban space was gendered and sexualized through courtship and marriage metaphors used by local newspapers. We argue that consolidation is represented in gendered and sexualized terms so that the question of municipal expansion became insulated frommoral, racialized, and environmental concerns about the “threats” of the big city. Our analysis has contemporary relevance because it suggests the sexist and heterosexist norms that may be embedded in the noblesse oblige of contemporary municipal consolidation. It also suggests a way of looking at contemporary municipal boundary changes through a normative lens that takes us beyond economic notions of self-interest

Consolidation (business · Media studies · Newspaper · Normative · Political science · Sociology · Gender Studies · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Scottish History and National Identity

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub