Collective securitisation in the EU
Normative Dimensions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6407336 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rita Floyd (0000-0003-1758-3540, University of Birmingham, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 391-412 |
| Publication date | 2019-02-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402382.2018.1510200 |
| OpenAlex | W2902851605 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 31 |
Discussions of collective political actors and normativity usually refer to the greater responsibility collectives (such as the EU) enjoy when acting upon the ills of the world either because such bodies are able to pool capabilities or because they enjoy the credibility of leading by example. Following a different line of argument, this article suggests that collective securitisation poses two hitherto unacknowledged normative issues. The first concerns the question whether just (morally permissible) collective securitisation requires unanimity, or second best, majority consensus on the need for, and the means of, securitisation by the constitutive member states of the collective. The second issue is related to individual states disaggregated from collective security actors. Specifically, ought those states culpable in threat creation be more liable for bearing the financial costs of collective securitisation
Argument (complex analysis · Collective action · Collective responsibility · Collective security · Credibility · Economics · European union · International relations · International trade · Law and economics · Member states · Normative · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Treaty · Unanimity · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Global Security and Public Health · International Law and Human Rights · Law
“Wars” on Covid-19 in Slovakia, Russia, and the United States
Exemplification in news narratives
Analysing the EU’s collective securitisation moves towards China
Morality of Security
Variations in the intensity of the securitization narratives at the EU level
The EU as a securitising agent? Testing the model, advancing the literature
States, Last Resort, and the Obligation to Securitize
Securitisation and the function of functional actors
Children as a new climate precariat
Climate Ethics
National Responsibility and Global Justice
Strangers in Our Midst
Security
Securitization Theory. How Security Problems Emerge and Dissolve
The Politics of Insecurity
Nato and the Ukraine crisis
Strangers in Our Midst
Schengen area shaken
Securitization and desecuritization
Security and the democratic scene
Can securitization theory be used in normative analysis? Towards a just securitization theory
Agents without agency
Politics, security, theory
Actor, Audience(s) and Emergency Measures
Extraordinary or ordinary emergency measures
Cosmopolitan Justice, Responsibility, and Global Climate Change
The Case Against Linking Environmental Degradation and National Security
Parallels with the hate speech debate
Towards a consequentialist evaluation of security
Securitizing Terrorism in Southeast Asia
The European Union
Morality of Security
States, Last Resort, and the Obligation to Securitize
Illocutionary Logic and Strands of Securitization
Securitization and the Construction of Security
Long wars and long telegrams
| Unique citing works | 9 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,29 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2024 (6) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 9 |