Judicial policy‐making in the Netherlands
The case‐by‐case method
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6408354 |
|---|---|
| Authors | P J Van Koppen (0000-0001-5781-6869, Erasmus University Rotterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1992 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 80-92 |
| Publication date | 1992-07-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402389208424922 |
| OpenAlex | W2050393804 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 5 |
The Dutch judiciary is modelled on the French one and places a premium on the separation of powers. One manifestation of this adherence to the strict separation of powers is the prohibition against judicial review. Judges in the ordinary courts, however, have since early in this century given broad interpretations to statutes becoming significant policy‐makers in Dutch politics because of the system of coalition governments. Laws are drafted in vague terms, leaving interpretation to the courts, and issues on which there is no possibility of political compromise find resolution only in the judicial forum
Compromise · Interpretation (philosophy · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Resolution (logic · Sociology · Statute · Comparative and International Law Studies · European and International Law Studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law
| Citations per year | 0.06 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1994 - 1994 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |