Tripartism in Luxembourg
The limits of social concertation
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6408425 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Mario Hirsch (Université de Strasbourg, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 1986 |
| Volumen | 9 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 54-66 |
| Fecha de publicación | 1986-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | West European Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0140-2382 • E-ISSN: 1743-9655 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01402388608424562 |
| OpenAlex | W2035226583 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
The Luxembourg model of social concertation seems especially suitable for a small country given the close links between the various social partners. The establishment of a formal Tripartite system in 1977 promised solutions for the deepening economic crisis, particularly affecting Luxembourg's important steel industry. In practice, Tripartism showed defects ‐ protecting vested interests, unequal burden sharing ‐ and it failed to develop an overall strategy to serve the national interest. The fear that the authority of Parliament was being eroded and a shift to the right in government proved decisive in reducing Tripartism to a subordinate and advisory role
Business · Economic policy · Economic system · Economics · Government (linguistics · Market economy · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Social partners · European and International Law Studies · European Union Policy and Governance · Law · Political Systems and Governance · Public Administration
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,08 |
| Intervalo de citas | 1988 - 2025 (38) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |