Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Historical and Current Influences on United States International Family Planning Policy

Bibliographic Data

ID6409145
AuthorsSuzanne Petroni (0000-0001-7617-7740, George Washington University, corresponding author)
Year2011
Volume32
Issue1
Pages28-51
Publication date2011-01-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1554477x.2011.537901
OpenAlexW1998904581
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited21

The United States has played a leading role in the international population arena for more than four decades. In the early years, support among US policymakers for family planning assistance to developing countries was strong, bipartisan, and centered on slowing the growth of these countries' populations. Since the early 1980s, US assistance has been highly politicized and increasingly partisan. Some blame this shift on feminists, who sought a role for government based on supporting individual freedom and women's health, rather than achieving demographic goals. This article suggests that the political shift resulted in large part from the growing political influence of the Religious Right in the United States

Blame · Developing country · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Family planning · Government (linguistics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Population · Population growth · Research methodology · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Social Psychology

  • A colonial legacy of HIV/Aids, NTD, and STI super-syndemics

    Open Access•Mehar Maju, Andria G Sharma et al.•Global Public Health•2019

  • ICPD beyond 2014

    Open Access•Serra Sippel•Global Public Health•2014

  • Reproductive rights and wrongs

    Betsy Hartmann•Reproductive rights and wrongs•1995

  • Organization Theory

    Oliver E Williamson•Organization theory•1995

  • Information and Legislative Organization

    Keith Krehbiel•Information and Legislative…•1991

  • Mobilizing Interest Groups in America

    Open Access•Jack L Walker, Jack Walker•Mobilizing interest groups in…•1991

  • Structure and Process, Politics and Policy

    Open Access•Matthew D McCubbins, Roger G Noll et al.•Virginia Law Review•1989

  • Family planning

    Open Access•John G F Cleland, John Cleland et al.•The Lancet•2006

  • The presidential power of unilateral action

    Terry M Moe, T Moe•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1999

  • Religion on Capitol Hill

    Paul J Weber, Peter L Benson et al.•Journal of Law and Religion•1983

  • Fatal misconception

    Open Access•Dave Johns, Amy L Fairchild•Global Public Health•2010

  • The religious right and the reshaping of sexual policy

    Diane di Mauro, Carole Joffe•Sexuality Research and Social…•2007

  • Does Women's Representation in Elected Office Lead to Women-Friendly Policy? Analysis of State-Level Data

    Amy Caiazza•Women & Politics•2004

  • Population Policies Reconsidered

    Jael Silliman, Gita Sen et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1996

  • United Nations Population Conferences

    Open Access•Jason L Finkle, C Alison Mcintosh•Studies in Family Planning•2002

  • Ideology and Politics at Mexico City

    Jason L Finkle, Barbara B Crane•Population and Development Review•1985

  • Divided Government and the Design of Administrative Procedures

    David Epstein, Sharyn O''Halloran et al.•The Journal of Politics•1996

  • Agency Leaders, Gendered Institutions, and Representative Bureaucracy

    Open Access•Judith R Saidel, Karyn Loscocco•Public Administration Review•2005

  • Conducting and Coding Elite Interviews

    Open Access•Joel D Aberbach, Bert A Rockman•PS Political Science & Politics•2002

  • The Dynamics of Legislative Gridlock, 1947-96

    Open Access•Sarah A Binder, Sarah Binder•American Political Science Review•1999

  • On the Origins of the United States Government's International Population Policy

    Peter J Donaldson, Peter Donaldson et al.•Population Studies•1990

  • The Evolution of US International Population Policy, 1965-92

    Marshall Green•Population and Development Review•1993

  • Population Policies Reconsidered

    C Alison Mcintosh, Gita Sen et al.•Population and Development Review•1994

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,17
Citation span2014 - 2019 (6)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae