Sexual Harassment Trajectories
Limits of (Current) Law and of the Administrative State
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6409666 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Carol Nackenoff (0000-0002-7898-7189, Swarthmore College, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2019 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21-41 |
| Publication date | 2019-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Women & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1554477x.2019.1563411 |
| OpenAlex | W2966720964 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 16 |
The current attack on the administrative state and its more inclusive policies is accompanied by a push to limit judicial deference to administrative rulemaking. This recent trend stands in tension with the #MeToo movement and a shift in constitutional culture regarding sexual misconduct that has been developing over several decades. While the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has continued to expand what counts as discrimination on the basis of sex under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act (recently adding sexual orientation to that list), and the Supreme Court has recognized some of these expansions, #MeToo invites rethinking what Title VII has and has not accomplished for women, why, likely prospects for addressing sexual misconduct, and the limits of law
Criminology · Current (fluid · Harassment · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science · Computer Science · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Engineering · Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies · Law · Psychology · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |