Denial of Care
Framing the Loss of Abortion Rights Post- Dobbs
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6409693 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Claire Mckinney (0000-0003-1967-7719, William & Mary, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 45 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 93-107 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Women & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1554477x.2024.2300097 |
| OpenAlex | W4391108333 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
After Dobbs, abortion access advocates try to make clear the harm of abortion criminalization. Two figures came to dominate the landscape: the reproductive martyr and the tragic abortion provider. Their stories focus on the threat to the health and life of women who need abortion for medical reasons. While such stories can produce sympathy for individuals and outrage at abortion bans, they occlude more important accounts of the loss of abortion rights that focus on the gender inequality of bodily violability. Understanding abortion rights as an issue of freedom and equality provides better grounds for understanding their loss
Abortion · Criminalization · Criminology · Denial · Family planning · Framing (construction · Harm · Human rights · Outrage · Political science · Pregnancy · Psychoanalysis · Redress · Reproductive rights · Sociology · Unsafe abortion · American Constitutional Law and Politics · History · Law · Psychology · Race, History, and American Society · Reproductive Health and Contraception
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |