Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Gender, Advice, and the Candidacy Gap in American Politics

Bibliographic Data

ID6409718
AuthorsJulia Cassidy, J William Cassidy (Lafayette College), Andrew J Clarke (0009-0001-7239-1253, Lafayette College, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue3
Pages315-334
Publication date2024-07-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1554477x.2024.2294511
OpenAlexW4391945406
LanguageEN
References cited30

American women remain vastly under-represented in positions of political power, and researchers have argued that this representational deficit is partially due to a political candidacy gap. In this article, we investigate the importance of gender identity at a formative moment in the development of political ambition. More specifically, we contacted thousands of local party leaders, donors, and activists to solicit advice for one of two student clubs: one women's group and one gender-nonspecific group. Our experiment suggests that overt gender identity can lead to greater guidance opportunities – particularly from Republican women. Moreover, while the advice offered to the women's club was far more likely to be gendered, the advice given to this group did not include a greater emphasis on the challenges associated with a political career. These findings suggest that organizational gender identity can meaningfully affect political mentorship experiences and, ultimately, the candidate pipeline.Footnote1

Advice (programming · Candidacy · Demographic economics · Economics · Gender gap · Political science · Politics · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Law · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • When Does Gender Matter?

    Kathleen A Dolan, Kathleen Dolan•When does gender matter?•2014

  • Women on the Run

    Open Access•Danny Hayes, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•Women on the Run•2016

  • He Runs, She Runs

    Open Access•Deborah Jordan Brooks•He Runs, She Runs•2013

  • More Women Can Run

    Susan J Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu•More Women Can Run•2013

  • Out of the Running

    Shauna Shame, Shauna Shames•Out of the Running•2017

  • Mobilizing Candidates

    Open Access•David E Broockman•Journal of Experimental Political…•2014

  • Gender, risk assessment, and political ambition

    Open Access•Jennie Sweet-Cushman•Politics and the Life Sciences•2016

  • How Conditioning on Posttreatment Variables Can Ruin Your Experiment and What to Do about It

    Open Access•Jacob M Montgomery, Brendan Nyhan et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Reconciling Family Roles with Political Ambition

    Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Can’t Buy Them Love

    Melody Crowder-Meyer, Rosalyn Cooperman•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Are You My Mentor? A Field Experiment on Gender, Ethnicity, and Political Self-Starters

    Joshua L Kalla, Joshua Kalla et al.•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Do Local Party Chairs Think Women and Minority Candidates Can Win? Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment

    David Doherty, Conor M Dowling et al.•The Journal of Politics•2019

  • Priming Self-Reported Partisanship

    Open Access•Kaylyn Jackson Schiff, B Pablo Montagnes et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2022

  • Mind the Gender Gap

    Open Access•Jessica R Preece•Politics & Gender•2016

  • Hostile Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, and American Elections

    Open Access•Nicholas J G Winter•Politics & Gender•2023

  • Encouragement is not Enough

    Open Access•Kelly Dittmar•Politics & Gender•2015

  • Recruitment and Perceptions of Gender Bias in Party Leader Support

    Open Access•Daniel M Butler, Jessica R Preece•Political Research Quarterly•2016

  • Which Women Can Run? Gender, Partisanship, and Candidate Donor Networks

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Michele L Swers•Political Research Quarterly•2017

  • The Impact of Gender Stereotyped Evaluations on Support for Women Candidates

    Open Access•Kathleen Dolan•Political Behavior•2010

  • Ambitious Women

    Open Access•Sparsha Saha, Ana Catalano Weeks•Political Behavior•2022

  • Gender, Race, and Intersectionality in Campaign Finance

    Open Access•Jacob M Grumbach, Alexander Sahn et al.•Political Behavior•2022

  • Women running the party and women running for Congress

    Open Access•Matthew J Geras•Party Politics•2021

  • Female Candidates and Legislators

    Jennifer L Lawle•Annual Review of Political Science•2015

  • Women Don't Run? Election Aversion and Candidate Entry

    Open Access•Kristin Kanthak, Jonathan Woon•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office

    Open Access•Richard L Fox, Jennifer L Lawle et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • How to Elect More Women

    Open Access•Christopher F Karpowitz, J Quin Monson et al.•American Journal of Political…•2017

  • Why Local Party Leaders Don't Support Nominating Centrists

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Nicholas Carnes et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Women's Representation and the Gendered Pipeline to Power

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen, Aaron S King•American Political Science Review•2020

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae