Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Risk, Resistance and Resilience

Birth Control Policy in the Wake of Dobbs

Bibliographic Data

ID6409902
AuthorsKevin Wallsten (California State University, Long Beach), Rachel Vansickle-Ward (Pitzer College, corresponding author), Sarah Hayes (0000-0001-8633-0155, Georgetown University)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue1
Pages148-166
Publication date2024-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWomen & Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1554477x.2024.2300093
OpenAlexW4391540445
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

The US Supreme Court's ruling in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization has potentially profound implications for contraception. Contraceptives came up frequently in oral arguments and constitutional protections for abortion and birth control are fundamentally linked (Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 US 479, 1965). Moreover, in recent decisions (Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. 573 US 682, 2014) the court has endorsed the position of some religious groups that certain forms of contraception are "abortifacients," essentially a form of abortion. This legal blurring of distinct scientific boundaries between abortion and birth control provides legal pathways for birth control restrictions. That said, in the immediate wake of Dobbs, policy change on birth control has been limited, media coverage on the risks posed to birth control have been scarce, and public support of birth control access has remained robust. We review the current landscape of birth control politics and policy after Dobbs, including state and federal policy responses, elite rhetoric, interest group advocacy, media coverage, and public opinion. Our analysis contributes to an emerging literature on birth control politics and policy

Biology · Physics · Political science · Resilience (materials science · Resistance (ecology · Wake · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Engineering · Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Law · Philosophy

  • The Past is Present

    Rachel Vansickle-Ward•Polity•2026

  • Law's Allure

    Open Access•Gordon Silverstein•Law's Allure•2009

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Elusive consensus

    Open Access•Jon Green, Jared F Edgerton et al.•Science Advances•2020

  • The Hollow Hope

    Gerald N Rosenberg, Gerald Rosenberg•The Hollow Hope•2008

  • Gender and attention to and framing of Covid‐19 in congressional tweets

    Open Access•Heather K Evans, Jennifer Hayes Clark•Social Science Quarterly•2023

  • Attention to the Covid‐19 Pandemic on Twitter

    Open Access•Taegyoon Kim, Nitheesha Nakka et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2021

  • Abortion, Attitudes and Appointments

    Rachel Vansickle-Ward, Adrian D Pantoja et al.•Women & Politics•2023

  • Testing Theories of American Politics

    Open Access•Martin Gilens, Benjamin I Page•Perspectives on Politics•2014

  • God Talk in a Digital Age

    Open Access•Brittany H Bramlett, Ryan P Burge•Politics and Religion•2021

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae