Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Trade-Offs of Social Democratic Party Strategies in a Pluralized Issue Space

A Conjoint Analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID6411486
AuthorsTarik Abou‐chadi (0000-0002-5529-2616), Tarik Abou-Chadi, Silja Häusermann (0000-0003-2410-8959), Reto Mitteregger (0000-0001-5987-283X), Nadja Mosimann (0000-0002-9612-8580), Markus Wagner (0000-0002-0036-1266)
Year2025
Volume77
Issue3
Pages419-467
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWorld Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-8871 • E-ISSN: 1086-3338
PublisherProject MUSE (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1353/wp.2025.a964462
OpenAlexW4412038262
LanguageEN
Citations received9

This article provides a novel framework and empirical test of the strategic trade-offs of political parties’ programmatic appeals. In a pluralized issue space, political positions have the potential to create severe strategic trade-offs for political parties, with gains among one group of voters offset by losses among another. Existing research assumes that these trade-offs are especially prominent for social democratic parties but does not directly test whether specific subelectorates respond differently to particular programmatic appeals. To identify trade-offs for social democratic parties, the authors ran conjoint experiments in six Western European countries. Respondents could choose between programs that varied on several issue dimensions. The authors find that trade-offs among potential social democratic voters are less pronounced than the literature expects, especially regarding economic policies. The findings also establish two underrated challenges for social democratic parties: the existence of stronger trade-offs between age groups and the potential longer-term consequences of salience trade-offs

Business · Conjoint analysis · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Industrial organization · Microeconomics · Political science · Politics · Preference · Space (punctuation) · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • “Nothing else matters?” Salience differences between young and old

    Open Access•Reto Mitteregger•European Political Science Review•2026

  • Winning with equality

    Open Access•Alexander Horn, Carsten Jensen et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2026

  • A game of tariffs

    Open Access•Michal Grahn, Katharina Lawall et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Attitudinal ambivalence toward multiculturalism

    Open Access•Francesco Raffaelli•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • The strategic dilemma of social democracy

    Open Access•Roman Hlatky, Oľga Gyárfášová•Electoral Studies•2025

  • Narratives of Backlash? Perceptions of Changing Status Hierarchies in Open-Ended Survey Responses

    Open Access•Magdalena Breyer, Tabea Palmtag et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • The universalist divide

    Open Access•Marco R Steenbergen, Delia Zollinger et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Are People Willing to Trade Away Democracy for Desirable Outcomes? Experimental Evidence From Six Countries

    Open Access•Jonathan A Chu, Sean Williamson et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2025

  • The Electoral Appeal of Symbolic Class Signalling Through Cultural Consumption

    Open Access•David Weisstanner, Engler•British Journal of Political…•2025

Unique citing works9
Citations per year9
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 9

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae