Some Complexities in Military Planning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6412070 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Malcolm W Hoag (University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1959 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 553-576 |
| Publication date | 1959-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0043-8871 • E-ISSN: 1086-3338 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2009592 |
| OpenAlex | W2070124008 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Several reasons for the welcome growth in serious public discussion of military affairs are apparent. Americans are increasingly realizing that we are terribly vulnerable. Military preparations can no longer be deferred until after the onset of hostilities, making it more important that we analyze carefully in peacetime what our preparations should be. The magnitude of our defense effort has so increased that it naturally draws more critical scrutiny. Above all, what we do in defense interacts crucially with our foreign policy. To these considerations that obviously stimulate discussion, we must add another that weakens an inhibition against it. Critics need defer far less than formerly to military expertise
Foreign policy · Law and economics · Peacetime · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Scrutiny · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Military History and Strategy · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|