Rationalizing Nato Strategy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6412245 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Malcolm W Hoag (University of California System, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 121-142 |
| Publication date | 1964-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0043-8871 • E-ISSN: 1086-3338 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2009390 |
| OpenAlex | W2330197494 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 2 |
Dialectics about NATO strategy have become tiresomely repetitious. One wishes they were unnecessary, ideally because a military threat had assuredly disappeared, or because a strategic nearconsensus had emerged. At least the strategic debate should have become more specific. But doctrine in the end is paramount, however unfortunate the consequences of trying to settle upon itex cathedra. Quantitative analyses that are not systematically related to possible doctrines can lose critical issues in a welter of data, while analyses confined to ways to implement a single doctrine are too constricted. If within NATO one or more nations insist that the mid-1950 doctrine fits the logo's, official alliance planners can be stifled
Alliance · Dialectic · Doctrine · Epistemology · Law and economics · Military doctrine · Military strategy · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · European and Russian Geopolitical Military Strategies · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Military History and Strategy · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1969 - 1969 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |