Must Strategy and Conscience Be Disjoined
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6412566 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Arthur Lee Burns (Australian National University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1965 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 687-702 |
| Publication date | 1965-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | World Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0043-8871 • E-ISSN: 1086-3338 |
| Publisher | Project MUSE (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2009328 |
| OpenAlex | W2155999568 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
A Critique of “Theories of Rational Decision” and an exposé of “Hazards and Pitfalls of Strategic Thinking” comprise the first two and more significant Parts of Strategy and Conscience. A third Part pleads for understanding between the United States and the Soviet Union, and for “ideological disarmament”; it presents vanother mode of thinking in which conscience is central
Conscience · Disarmament · Epistemology · Ideology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Soviet union · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 0.02 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1968 - 1968 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |