Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Utah producers and soil health

Digging Deeper

Bibliographic Data

ID6414393
AuthorsPeggy Petrzelka (0000-0002-4276-0054), Jessica D Ulrich-Schad (0000-0002-2437-5419), Matt Yost (0000-0001-5012-8481)
Year2025
Volume42
Issue3
Pages2217-2222
Publication date2025-01-23
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAgriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366
PublisherSpringer Nature (Netherlands) (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1007/s10460-024-10697-7
OpenAlexW4406757797
LanguageEN
References cited12

While the importance of soil health has been widely documented in certain areas of the U.S., such as the Midwest and Great Plains, other agricultural lands and producers remain largely understudied regarding soil health, including those in the Intermountain West (IMW). In this field report, we dig deeper into differing viewpoints on soil health held by Utah producers, examining how those more and less open to soil health efforts compare in various ways. Using data from a 2024 mail and online survey of Utah producers, we focus on two questions in this exploratory work: (1) How do producers who are more open to soil health practices compare by characteristics, attitudes, and behaviors with those producers who are less open to such practices and (2) What support do those more open to improving soil health need to increase soil health efforts on their land? We find the producers are both similar in several ways but also differ in important ways. Digging deeper and parsing out producers based on their opinions, influences, and information sources as they relate to soil health provides some valuable insights for those doing research and outreach on soil health in the IMW

Archaeology · Business · Digging · Environmental planning · Geography · Sociology · Soil health · Soil organic matter · Soil water · Environmental Science · Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics · Soil Science

  • Why farmers adopt best management practice in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Baumgart-Getz, Linda Stalker Prokopy et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2012

  • Synthesizing Conservation Motivations and Barriers

    Open Access•Pranay Ranjan, Sarah P Church et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2019

  • Managing for the middle

    Open Access•Hailey Wilmer, N Schareika et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2019

  • We’re very late to the party”

    Open Access•Peggy Petrzelka, Jessica D Ulrich-Schad et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2023

  • Crop advisers as conservation intermediaries

    Open Access•Francis R Eanes, Ajay S Singh et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • The role of systems thinking in cover crop adoption

    Open Access•Sarah P Church, Junyu Lu et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Carbon sequestration and private rangelands

    Open Access•Seth Cook, Seth L Cook et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae