Climate protection or agricultural production site? How political actors frame the future use of German peatlands
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6414441 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christof Petrick (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Cora Petrick (0009-0002-0382-6978), Wiebke Nowack (0000-0003-1277-4401, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Harald Grethe (0000-0002-4467-6905, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 2759-2771 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-28 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Agriculture and Human Values (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0889-048X • E-ISSN: 1572-8366 |
| Publisher | Springer Nature (Netherlands) (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10460-025-10776-3 |
| OpenAlex | W4413790264 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
Drained peatlands are a major source of agricultural greenhouse gas emissions in Germany. To eliminate a large proportion of these emissions, they need to be rewetted, which requires substantial change in land use. Respective plans are causing conflict between stakeholders and are subject of a political debate. This article analyses frames in the debate on the future use of currently drained peatlands in Germany by studying public textual communications from political stakeholders between 2019 and 2022. Three frames are identified: (1) an environmental frame, emphasising environmental protection, which is most commonly used by environmental interest groups, the government and in party communication; (2) an entrepreneurial frame, portraying farmers as change makers, which is mainly used by a landscape management association, but also in government communication; (3) a socio-economic threat frame, which perceives farmers as threatened by peatland rewetting policies, and which is mainly present in farmers’ associations. All actors recognise peatland rewetting as an effective climate change mitigation measure. Most actors also agree that land users have a role to play in the process of reducing emissions from agricultural peatlands. While the environmental and socio-economic threat frames assign land users a rather passive role in the land-use change process, the entrepreneurial frame portrays land users as agents of change. We conclude that politicians, policy makers and other stakeholders may benefit from strengthening and refining an entrepreneurial frame. Such a frame would consider the opportunities and challenges of future peatland uses and facilitate land user agency, reconciling economic and environmental objectives
Agency (philosophy · Agricultural land · Agriculture · Business · Climate change · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Government (linguistics · Greenhouse gas · Natural resource economics · Peat · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Ecology, Conservation, and Geographical Studies · Environmental Science · Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Ecology
Towards a Better Conceptual Framework for Innovation Processes in Agriculture and Rural Development
Frame-critical policy analysis and frame-reflective policy practice
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Deliberating Our Frames
Frame Reflection
Who with Whom in Biofuel Policy? Coalitions in the Media Discourse on Liquid Biofuels in Germany
Conflicting rationalities, knowledge and values in scarred landscapes
Contentious Repertoires in Great Britain, 1758-1834
Framing in geographical analysis of environmental conflicts
The “balance discourse”
When Effect Becomes Cause
Paradigm Shifts and Policy Networks
Discursive Struggle and Agency-Updating the Finnish Peatland Conservation Network
Media Framing and Public Attitudes Toward Biofuels
New Avenues for Framing Research
Toward a General Theory of Strategic Action Fields
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |