Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Pseudolaw and the illusion of legal meaning

Bibliographic Data

ID6414549
AuthorsJoe Mcintyre (0000-0003-2267-9600, UniSA Justice & Society, University of South Australia, Australia, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume50
Issue3
Pages190-196
Publication date2025-07-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAlternative Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1037-969X • E-ISSN: 2398-9084
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1037969x251362538
OpenAlexW4412686166
LanguageEN

This article is an overview of the contemporary phenomenon of pseudolaw and argues that, at its heart, it involves a mistaking of the form of legal argumentation for its substance. Essentially, through the use of legalistic language, archaic sources and strange rituals, an illusion of legal meaning is created which tricks users into believing their actions are legally meaningful. This article argues that it shares common features with generative AI, in that it produces an illusion of meaning which users mistake for actual meaning. It then explores this juxtaposition and its implications for responses to pseudolaw

Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Illusion · Law and economics · Meaning (existential · Political science · Sociology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Law · Law in Society and Culture · Philosophy · Psychology

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae