Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Reflections on 50 years of sentencing reform

The good, the bad and the future

Bibliographic Data

ID6414598
AuthorsArie Freiberg (0000-0003-0099-3164, Monash University, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume50
Issue2
Pages140-144
Publication date2025-03-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAlternative Law Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1037-969X • E-ISSN: 2398-9084
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1037969x251323921
OpenAlexW4408388666
LanguageEN

Sentencing reform in Australia over the past 50 years has reflected ideological conflicts and deeper structural transformations in the economy and in society. It is a tale of two paradigms, one which is inclusive, participatory and rehabilitative, the other punitive and populist. This article identifies many of the positive changes over that period such as the recognition of the role of victims in the criminal justice system, the introduction of diversion programs, restorative justice and problem-oriented courts, the growth of trauma-informed sentencing and the creation of sentencing advisory councils. It also notes the rise of the prison population. The influence of penal populism has produced mandatory sentencing laws, restrictions on parole and post-release dispositions for those deemed to be too dangerous to be released into the community. Finally, it notes the possible role of artificial intelligence in sentencing

Criminology · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Sociology · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Legal Systems and Judicial Processes · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae