Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Tensions Between Independence, Learning and Accountability in Internal Evaluation

The Case of the World Bank

Bibliographic Data

ID6414829
AuthorsJohn Richard Heath (0009-0000-8114-7407, American University)
Year2025
Volume46
Issue4
Pages590-608
Publication date2025-07-10
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Journal of Evaluation (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1098-2140 • E-ISSN: 1557-0878
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/10982140251353522
OpenAlexW4412187617
LanguageEN
References cited29

All internal evaluation units of public sector agencies face tradeoffs arising from the tension within the “independence-accountability-learning” nexus. Most such units are not independent, unlike the World Bank unit, which was ostensibly independent from its inception half a century ago. But new archival evidence reveals that between July 1973 and October 1974 President Robert S. McNamara and other principals resisted independence—which entailed the transfer of evaluation governance from management to the shareholders. This effort was in vain because the United States government used its leverage over the World Bank to impose the General Accounting Office's preferred model of independent evaluation. The debate in the early 1970s about whether independence would result in isolation, thereby hampering learning by operations staff, still resonates. Recent external reviews have concluded that accountability tends to trump learning in World Bank evaluation, suggesting lessons for internal evaluation units more generally

Accountability · Economics · Evaluation methods · Independence (probability theory · Political science · Statistics · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · International Development and Aid · Mathematics · Psychology · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • Hypocrisy Trap

    Catherine Weaver, Catherine E Weaver•Hypocrisy Trap•2008

  • The World Bank

    Devesh Kapur•The World Bank•1997

  • Leadership lessons untold

    Open Access•J R Heath, Leo Mccann•Leadership•2021

  • What have we learned here? Questioning accountability in aid policy and practice

    Open Access•Lauren Kogen•Evaluation•2018

  • Accountability and learning in development evaluation

    Open Access•Robert Picciotto•Evaluation•2018

  • How are accountability and organisational learning related? A study of German bilateral development cooperation

    Open Access•Daniel E Esser, Heiner Janus•Evaluation•2023

  • Evaluating aid

    Open Access•Livingston Armytage•Evaluation•2011

  • Is Adversary Evaluation Worth a Second Look

    Open Access•Robert Picciotto•American Journal of Evaluation•2018

  • What Makes an Evaluation Useful? Reflections from Experience in Large Organizations

    Open Access•Patrick G Grasso•American Journal of Evaluation•2003

  • Bridging the Divide between Upward Accountability and Learning-Based Approaches to Development Evaluation

    Open Access•June Lennie, Jo Tacchi•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2014

  • US hegemony and the World Bank

    R Wade, Robert Hunter Wade•Review of International Political…•2002

  • Capacity Development in Practice

    Lars Udsholt•Development in Practice•2011

  • Robert McNamara at the World Bank

    William Clark•Foreign Affairs•1981

  • A Functional Analysis of Defense Department Decision-Making in the McNamara Administration

    Open Access•Paul Y Hammond•American Political Science Review•1968

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae