Crypto Fever

Law, Regulation, and the Promise of Trustless Trust

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6415224
AutoresSusan P Shapiro (American Bar Foundation, autor correspondente)
Ano2025
Volume21
Fascículo1
Páginas87-105
Data de publicação2025-06-10
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAnnual Review of Law and Social Science (BOOK_SERIES)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1550-3585 • E-ISSN: 1550-3631
EditoraAnnual Reviews (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110124-063008
OpenAlexW4411177552
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas23

Cryptocurrency proclaims itself trustless—jettisoning the intermediaries, organizations, and legal authorities (what its creator called trust) upon which the traditional financial system relies. Instead, it offers “trustless trust,” distributing self-regulatory responsibility to software run by decentralized masses of volunteers and deploying a buzzword that denotes safety and privacy of transactions untethered to law, the state, or corporate intermediaries. But decentralization and distributed responsibility have proven difficult to sustain. At every turn, entrepreneurs and users of digital currencies have embraced centralization and new organizational forms, many able to dodge both crypto self-regulation and conventional financial regulation entirely, while enjoying the benefits of their purported trustworthiness. This faux decentralization leaves crypto platforms vulnerable to wrongdoing, but also to the legal and regulatory interventions that mitigate risk in traditional financial instruments. Moreover, crypto technology provides a unique window into misconduct and new opportunities to forestall or regulate it, measures unavailable to conventional currencies

Business · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Asian Culture and Media Studies · Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics · Law · Law in Society and Culture