Rethinking Power Sharing
Assessing Models Through Expert Insights in the Balkans
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6416368 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stefan Surlić (0000-0003-4174-9889), Zoran Dabetić |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 25 |
| Pages | 265-283 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-21 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Balkan Social Science Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1857-8772 • E-ISSN: 1857-8799 |
| Publisher | Goce Delchev University - Shtip (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.46763/bssr252525265s |
| OpenAlex | W4411679712 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 10 |
The paper examines expert assessments of the effectiveness, sustainability, and integrative potential of power-sharing institutions in three post-conflict Balkan polities—Bosnia and Herzegovina, North Macedonia, and Kosovo—with Montenegro serving as a control case. Drawing on an original survey of 111 scholars and civil-society representatives, the study quantifies expert perceptions of institutional performance, the risk of renewed conflict, and the role of international actors. The findings reveal a common pattern: while power-sharing arrangements have delivered short-term conflict containment and ensured ethnic representation, they have fallen short of fostering durable inter-ethnic integration. By contrasting these results with the more moderate Montenegrin evaluations, the article shows that the lasting intensity of wartime legacies—rather than institutional design alone—shapes expectations of political stability and reconciliation. Methodologically, the study demonstrates the added value of expert surveys for capturing post-conflict dynamics that escape conventional datasets. Substantively, it refines the debate on when and how power-sharing can move beyond eliteaccommodation to societal integration, providing a baseline against which future longitudinal and comparative research can be gauged
Knowledge management · Physics · Power (physics · Power sharing · Computer Science · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies
| Highly cited | No |
|---|