Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Defaults are not a panacea

Distinguishing Between Default Effects on Choices and on Outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID6416475
AuthorsDavid A Kalkstein (0000-0001-9731-9066, Stanford University, corresponding author), Fabiana De Oliveira Lima (0000-0002-6114-9242, The Ohio State University), Shannon T Brady (0000-0003-3975-3301, Wake Forest University), Christopher S Rozek (0000-0003-4389-8538, Washington University in St. Louis), E Johnson (0000-0001-7797-8347, Columbia University), Gary M Walton (0000-0002-6194-0472, Stanford University)
Year2022
Volume9
Issue2
Pages410-425
Publication date2022-08-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBehavioural Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2398-063X • E-ISSN: 2398-0648
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/bpp.2022.24
OpenAlexW4289517773
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited20

Recently, defaults have become celebrated as a low-cost and easy-to-implement nudge for promoting positive outcomes, both at an individual and societal level. In the present research, we conducted a large-scale field experiment ( N = 32,508) in an educational context to test the effectiveness of a default intervention in promoting participation in a potentially beneficial achievement test. We found that a default manipulation increased the rate at which high school students registered to take the test but failed to produce a significant change in students’ actual rate of test-taking. These results join past literature documenting robust effects of default framings on initial choice but marked variability in the extent to which those choices ultimately translate to real-world outcomes. We suggest that this variability is attributable to differences in choice-to-outcome pathways – the extent to which the initial choice is causally determinative of the outcome

Actuarial science · Context (archaeology · Default · Determinative · Economics · Intervention (counseling · Microeconomics · Outcome (game theory · Panacea (medicine · Political science · Scale (ratio · Test (biology · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Medicine · Psychology · School Choice and Performance · Finance

  • The i-frame and the s-frame

    Open Access•Nick Chater, G Loewenstein•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2023

  • Exploring browsing patterns in domain-specific critical online reasoning

    Open Access•Andreas Maur, Ann-Kathrin Kunz et al.•Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissensch…•2026

  • Exploring the nuances of cooperation in public health – a critical reflection on default policies and reputation effects

    Open Access•Eamonn Ferguson, Richard Mills•Global Discourse•2023

  • Nudging citizens co-production

    Open Access•Rotem Dvir•Policy Sciences•2024

  • Partitioning Variation in Multilevel Models

    Harvey Goldstein, William Browne et al.•Understanding Statistics•2002

  • Do Defaults Save Lives?

    Open Access•E Johnson, Daniel Goldstein•Science•2003

  • The effectiveness of nudging

    Open Access•Stephanie Mertens, Mario Herberz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Should Governments Invest More in Nudging?

    Open Access•Shlomo Benartzi, John Beshears et al.•Psychological Science•2017

  • Seed and Soil

    Open Access•Gary M Walton, David S Yeager•Current Directions in Psychological…•2020

  • The Power of Suggestion

    Brigitte C Madrian, Dennis F Shea•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • Temporal construal.

    Yaacov Trope, Nira Liberman•Psychological Review•2003

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Crime, commitment, and the responsive bystander

    Thomas M Moriarty, Thomas Moriarty•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • When and why defaults influence decisions

    Open Access•Jon M Jachimowicz, Shannon Duncan et al.•Behavioural Public Policy•2019

  • Nudge

    Open Access•Richard V Adkisson•The Social Science Journal•2008

  • The role of psychological factors and institutional channels in predicting the attainment of postsecondary goals

    Open Access•J Parker Goyer, Gary M Walton et al.•Developmental Psychology•2021

  • Interpreting Effect Sizes of Education Interventions

    Open Access•Matthew A Kraft•Educational Researcher•2020

  • Cognitive dissonance and psychotherapy

    Open Access•Danny Axsom, Joel Cooper•Journal of Experimental Social…•1985

  • Large and persistent effects of green energy defaults in the household and business sectors

    Open Access•Ulf Liebe, Jennifer Gewinner et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

  • Dynamics of self-regulation

    Minjung Koo, Ayelet Fishbach•Journal of Personality and Social…•2008

  • Green defaults can combat climate change

    Open Access•Cass R Sunstein•Nature Human Behaviour•2021

Citations per year1.33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae