Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Authority Over Investigation Decisions in Child Welfare Services

How is it Distributed Among Social Workers, Managers and Citizen Representatives

Bibliographic Data

ID6417850
AuthorsFilip Wollter (0000-0001-7116-5601, Department of Social Sciences Marie Cederschiöld University Stockholm Sweden, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume30
Issue3
Pages476-486
Publication date2024-05-12
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueChild & Family Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1356-7500 • E-ISSN: 1365-2206
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cfs.13192
OpenAlexW4396869477
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited34

This study examined the distribution of authority over decisions made during investigations within child welfare services (CWS). The distribution between various actors, such as social workers, citizen representatives and managers, was examined regarding 19 key decisions that frequently occur during investigations. The study also examined how the municipal socio‐economic status and the internal organizational conditions of CWS impact the overall hierarchical level of authority using linear regression analysis. The study was a full population study of Swedish municipalities and districts in larger cities ( n = 309, response rate of 62%). The study indicates that the head of the unit holds authority over most decision types, followed by the social worker. However, the study also indicates that there are significant variations between municipalities and decision types. In the municipality delegating authority to the lowest hierarchical level, social workers hold authority over 15 decision types compared with two decision types in the municipality delegating authority to the highest hierarchical level. This variation concerns most decision types except two, where authority is almost exclusively delegated to the same actor in all municipalities. The regression analysis indicated that the educational level of the municipal inhabitants and the size of the CWS budget were the strongest predictors of the hierarchical level of authority in a municipality. High educational levels in municipalities are associated with delegating authority to low hierarchical levels, such as social workers, whereas large CWS budgets (spending as SEK per inhabitant) are associated with delegating authority to high hierarchical levels, such as top‐level managers. The implications of these results for social work research and practice are discussed

Business · Local authority · Political science · Public relations · Social Welfare · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law · Psychology · Public Administration · Social Psychology · Social Work Education and Practice · Social Work

  • Assessing the Quality of Transition Plans in Out‐of‐Home Care

    Open Access•Hayley Wainwright, Melissa Savaglio et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2026

  • Child Protection Systems

    Neil Gilbert, Nigel Parton et al.•Child protection systems•2011

  • Variable selection strategies and its importance in clinical prediction modelling

    Open Access•Mohammad Ziaul Islam Chowdhury, Tanvir Chowdhury Turin•Family Medicine and Community…•2020

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy

    Michael Lipsky•Michigan Law Review•1981

  • Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics

    Open Access•Geoff Norman, Geoffrey R Norman•Advances in Health Sciences…•2010

  • Discretion in the Welfare State

    Anders Molander•Discretion in the Welfare State•2016

  • Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom

    Open Access•Peter Mascini, Tony Evans et al.•Discretion and the Quest for…•2020

  • Professional Discretion and Accountability in the Welfare State

    Open Access•Anders Molander, Harald Grimen et al.•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2012

  • Intergroup Contacts, Neighborhood Diversity, and Community Trust

    Open Access•Susanne Wallman Lundåsen•Journal of International…•2023

  • Re‐conceptualising the link between research and practice in social work

    Open Access•Milena Heinsch, Mel Gray et al.•International Journal of Social…•2016

  • Children's and young people's participation within child welfare and child protection services

    Open Access•Ganna G Van Bijleveld, Christine Dedding et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2015

  • Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence-based Practice in the Social Services

    Pedro Morago•Journal of Evidence-Based Social…•2010

  • Pragmatic professionalism

    Andreas Liljegren•European Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Who runs the mill? The distribution of power in Swedish social service agencies

    Staffan Johansson•European Journal of Social Work•2011

  • Determining interventions for vulnerable families

    Filip Wollter•European Journal of Social Work•2021

  • Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work

    Tone Alm Andreassen•European Journal of Social Work•2018

  • Making sense of common sense

    Open Access•Torbjörn Forkby, Staffan Höjer et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2013

  • Vulnerable children's rights to participation, protection, and provision

    Open Access•Maria Heimer, Elisabet Näsman et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2017

  • Children expressing their views in child protection casework

    Open Access•Asgeir Falch‐eriksen, Karmen Toros et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2021

  • Towards a Sociological Theory of Discretion

    Open Access•Elaine Campbell•International Journal of the…•1999

  • Child welfare removal of infants

    Open Access•Anne-Dorthe Hestbæk, Ingrid Höjer et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • New public management and social work in Sweden and England

    Open Access•Elisabeth Berg, Elisabeth E B Berg et al.•International Journal of…•2008

  • Organisational Rules and Discretion in Adult Social Work

    Tony Evans•The British Journal of Social Work•2013

  • Street-Level Bureaucracy, Social Work and the (Exaggerated) Death of Discretion

    Tony Evans•The British Journal of Social Work•2004

  • When Professional Power Fails

    Eve E Garrow, Yeheskel Hasenfeld•Social Service Review•2016

  • The Institutional Logics Perspective

    Patricia H Thornton, William Ocasio et al.•The institutional logics…•2012

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae