Enhancing collaborative resilience planning
Unifying stakeholder value systems through integrating reinforcement learning and network analysis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6418973 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Hang Ren (0000-0001-5326-6433, Virginia Tech), Lu Zhang (0000-0002-8855-8492, Virginia Tech, corresponding author), Travis A Whetsell (0000-0001-5395-4754, Georgia Institute of Technology), N Emel Ganapati (0000-0003-0967-9593) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 170 |
| Pages | 106635-106635 |
| Publication date | 2025-11-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-2751 • E-ISSN: 1873-6084 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.cities.2025.106635 |
| OpenAlex | W7105515805 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 72 |
Resilience planning necessitates the integration of diverse stakeholder values – the things that matter most to stakeholders – to formulate strategies that are effective and inclusive. However, stakeholders from different sectors (e.g., public, private, non-profit) hold numerous values with varying degrees of importance, forming their unique value systems. The divergent value systems can become a root cause of conflicts and impede consensus reaching. Currently, there is limited research on how to unify diverse stakeholder value systems to resolve conflicts in resilience planning. To address this methodological gap, this paper introduces a new Stakeholder Value Unification (SVU) model, which combines network analysis with reinforcement learning to support consensus-building in resilience planning. The SVU model uses stakeholder survey data on value priorities and collaboration networks as inputs. It first assesses each stakeholder's structural positions through centrality measures, then incorporates these positions into a deep Q-learning algorithm. By framing consensus-building as a sequential decision-making problem, the reinforcement learning component identifies value adjustment strategies that maximize collective agreement while minimizing individual concessions. The SVU model offers a systematic approach to reconcile divergent stakeholder value systems while accounting for their network positions to foster more collaborative planning outcomes. We demonstrate the applicability of the proposed SVU model under multiple scenarios through hypothetical and real-world case studies on housing resilience planning. The model provides policymakers with a tool for systematically incorporating value systems of different stakeholders into resilience planning, thus potentially supporting multisector stakeholder collaboration and facilitating the development of more socially acceptable resilience strategies.
Centrality · Learning network · Network analysis · Reinforcement learning · Resilience (materials science · Social network analysis · Stakeholder · Stakeholder analysis · Unification · Value (mathematics · Value network · Collaboration in agile enterprises · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Infrastructure Resilience and Vulnerability Analysis · Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Urban Planning and Governance
Scenario-based stakeholder engagement
A theory of participation
The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research
Gephi
Understanding multisector stakeholder value systems on housing resilience in the City of Miami
Paving the way for collaborative resilience planning
Understanding Multisector Stakeholder Value Dynamics in Hurricane Michael
Analyzing Multisector Stakeholder Collaboration and Engagement in Housing Resilience Planning in Greater Miami and the Beaches through Social Network Analysis
Data Mining for Community Resilience
Towards a resilience management guideline — Cities as a starting point for societal resilience
Roadmap towards justice in urban climate adaptation research
Collaborative Decision-Making in Emergency and Disaster Management
Social equity in urban resilience planning
Understanding nature’s contributions to people in ancient biocultural systems through network and RLQ analysis
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Participant engagement in environmentally focused social network research
Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality
Centrality and network flow
Why is socially‐just climate change adaptation in sub‐Saharan Africa so challenging? A review of barriers identified from empirical cases
Towards effective stakeholder collaboration in building urban resilience in Phnom Penh
Stakeholder involvement in community resilience
Measuring social equity in flood recovery funding
Consensus Building
The role of social networks in natural resource governance
Equity Impacts of Urban Land Use Planning for Climate Adaptation
Values, conflict, and trust in participatory environmental planning
Researchers' perspective on the main strengths and weaknesses of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) procedures
The Exchange Boundary Framework
Incorporating stakeholders’ preferences into a multi-criteria framework for planning large-scale Nature-Based Solutions
The Design and Implementation of Cross‐Sector Collaborations
A Framework for Assessing Power in Collaborative Governance Processes
Diversity, Trust, and Social Learning in Collaborative Governance
A Deliberative Approach to Conflicts of Culture
An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance
Deliberation and Decision in Collaborative Governance
Convening for Consensus
Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management
Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards
Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice
Weathering the storm
| Highly cited | No |
|---|