Building deservingness and fairness with discourse
How States Construct the Social Legitimacy of Pension Schemes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6420936 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Yan Wang (0009-0009-9633-0023, University of Manchester, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 280-298 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critical Policy Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1946-0171 • E-ISSN: 1946-018X |
| Publisher | Taylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/19460171.2024.2366934 |
| OpenAlex | W4399746627 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 44 |
How do modern states legitimize and frame their redistributive social policies in promoting policy changes to the public? This article studies pension reform in China, using quantitative text analysis of articles from official newspapers to investigate the state's efforts in framing and crafting the social legitimacy – particularly deservingness and fairness – of its then-new pension schemes from 1978 to 2008. The results demonstrate that the state made efforts to reconstruct social knowledge on fairness and deservingness in pension reforms through both the social values and individual subjectivities. The state's strategies for reconstructing public expectations for pension benefit redistribution and welfare responsibility allocation differ for retrenchment and expansive reforms, even though these strategies both target recrafting and reframing the principles of reciprocity based on 'contribution and rewards' and 'rights and obligations'. The state also builds images of deserving and undeserving social groups by blurring the distinction between merit and equity and ultimately reshaping individual subjectivity as a self-regulated and self-motivated 'socialized self
Construct (python library · Economics · Law and economics · Legitimacy · Pension · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Computer Science · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies
China's Contentious Pensioners
Political man
Varieties of Capitalism in Post-Communist Countries
Post-State Socialism
Just Institutions Matter
Social policy in China
The Political Sociology of the Welfare State
China's Post-Socialist Inequality
The Politics and Economics of Pension Privatization in Latin America
Can China’s new rural social pension insurance adequately protect the elderly in times of population ageing
Institutions, discourse and welfare
Conceptualising the politics of social protection expansion in low income countries
Pension privatisation in Greater China
Communist nostalgia and the consolidation of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe
China's Pension Reform and Its Discontents
Deserving social benefits? Political framing and media framing of ‘deservingness’ in two welfare reforms in Denmark
Rural pension reform in China
The political path to universal health coverage
The Path‐dependency of an Idea
Pension system reform in China
Left to Market and Family – Again? Ideas and the Development of the Rural Pension Policy in China
Discourse, Learning and Welfare State Change
Ideas and Social Policy
Welfare reform and public justification
The Social Construction of an Imperative
The Idea of Power and the Role of Ideas
Text as Data
Power through, over and in ideas
Europeanization and the mechanics of economic policy adjustment
The Birth of Biopolitics
Policy Paradigms, Social Learning, and the State
The Political Sociology of the Welfare State
Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy
Institutional analysis and the role of ideas in political economy
From Rights to Activation
Private Pension Planning
Agency, Rationality and Social Policy
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |