Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Which would be more democratic? Allowing them the opportunity to change their mind or pressing on regardless

A discursive psychological study of arguments for and against calls for a second Brexit referendum

Bibliographic Data

ID6421704
AuthorsAlexander R Hunt (Heriot-Watt University), Mirko A Demasi (0000-0003-1112-8141, Leeds Beckett University, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume36
Issue1
Pages60-77
Publication date2024-06-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDiscourse & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0957-9265 • E-ISSN: 1460-3624
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09579265241257629
OpenAlexW4399683861
LanguageEN
References cited36

Parliamentary debates are beneficial political environments to study using discourse analysis and discursive psychology. However, there is limited discursive psychological research analysing arguments for and against the possibility of a second referendum concerning the UK’s EU membership status. We collected our data by transcribing a parliamentary debate where politicians discussed a second referendum and analysed it using a discursive psychological framework. Whether they supported leave or remain, politicians discredit their opposing position for supposedly lacking democratic values. As such, politicians portrayed their stances on Brexit as a requirement to uphold democratic principles. The main implication of the analysis demonstrated that politicians defined democracy depending on the positions they took regarding calls for a second Brexit referendum. The present study contributes to the growing discursive literature on Brexit discourse by showing how the meaning of democracy is contested and used as a tool to manage accountability

Brexit · Democracy · Discourse analysis · Economics · Epistemology · European union · Linguistics · Meaning (existential · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Referendum · Sociology · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Law · Social and Intergroup Psychology

  • Representing Reality

    Jonathan Potter•Representing Reality•1996

  • ‘Just an ordinary Australian’

    Open Access•Mark Rapley•British Journal of Social…•1998

  • Critical discourse analysis of political press conferences

    Open Access•Aditi Bhatia•Discourse & Society•2006

  • Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines

    Open Access•Círculo De Linguística aplicada a la Comunicación•Círculo de lingüística aplicada a…•2016

  • Discourse, peace, and conflict discursive psychology perspectives

    Open Access•Stephen Gibson•Discourse, peace, and conflict…•2018

  • I don’t think there is any moral basis for taking money away from people’

    Philippa Carr, Simon Goodman et al.•Critical Discourse Studies•2018

  • Accountability in the Russo-Ukrainian war

    Mirko A Demasi•Peace and Conflict Journal of…•2022

  • Denying equality

    Open Access•Sonja J Elli, Sonja J Ellis et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•2002

  • The Humanisation of Refugees

    Open Access•Steve Kirkwood•Journal of Community & Applied…•2017

  • The use of the political categories of B rexiter and R emainer in online comments about the EU referendum

    Open Access•Joanne Meredith, Emma Richardson•Journal of Community & Applied…•2019

  • Let’s kill him”

    Krisda Chaemsaithong, Yoonjeong Kim et al.•Social Semiotics•2019

  • Making psychology relevant

    Open Access•Jonathan Potter•Discourse & Society•2005

  • Rethinking Cognition

    Open Access•Jonathan Potter, Derek Edwards•Human Studies•2003

  • Extreme case formulations

    Open Access•A Pomerantz•Human Studies•1986

  • Nigel Lawson's tent

    Open Access•Jonathan Potter, Derek Edwards•European Journal of Social…•1990

  • The argumentative nature of holding strong views

    Open Access•M Billig•European Journal of Social…•1989

  • Sad day for the UK”

    Open Access•Simon Goodman, Amrita Narang et al.•European Journal of Social…•2019

  • Facts as Social Action in Political Debates about the European Union

    Open Access•Mirko A Demasi•Political Psychology•2019

  • Shelving Issues

    Open Access•Lotte Van Burgsteden, Hedwig Te Molder•Journal of Language and Social…•2022

  • Constructions of Participatory Democracy Institutions and Same‐Sex Union Rights in Online Public Deliberation in Greece

    Open Access•Ioannis Michos, Lia Figgou et al.•Political Psychology•2020

  • Post-truth politics

    M Montgomery•Journal of Language and Politics•2017

  • Cautious morality

    Open Access•Cristian Tileaga•Discourse Studies•2010

  • Analyzing Race Talk

    Open Access•Hernan Vera•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•2005

  • The limits of questioning

    Open Access•J Heritage•Journal of Pragmatics•2002

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae