Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The proportion and utilisation of formal kinship and network care in Norway and Denmark

A Comparative Study

Bibliographic Data

ID6423825
AuthorsBo Morthorst Rasmussen (0000-0003-3372-4120, NUBU, UC SYD, corresponding author), Jeanette Skoglund (0000-0002-7755-3223, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Renee Thørnblad (0000-0003-2561-7018, UiT The Arctic University of Norway)
Year2024
Volume28
Issue6
Pages1306-1317
Publication date2024-11-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of Social Work (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-1457 • E-ISSN: 1468-2664
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/13691457.2024.2423381
OpenAlexW4404535651
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited20

In the past decades, the implementation of regulations and legislation, \nwhich encourage the use of formal kinship and network care, has taken \nplace in many countries. Yet, the proportion seems to vary greatly, also \nbetween countries often regarded as similar. Denmark and Norway are \nexamples of this. In 2021, 33% of children in care lived in kinship and \nnetwork care compared to 13% in Denmark. The aim of this paper is to \nget a better understanding of these differences. For this paper, we have \ndelved into the historical development of CWS in both countries, with \nparticular attention to the last 20 years. The factors suggested as \npossible reasons for differences in the proportion and utilisation of \nkinship and network care in Denmark and Norway, relate mainly to \nthree overlapping levels: policy and values, organisational structures \nand case management. Possible implications and limitations are \ndiscussed

Kinship · Kinship care · Political science · Sociology · Anthropology · Child Welfare and Adoption · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Law · Psychology · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Work

  • The Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norway

    Open Access•Renee Thørnblad, Jeanette Skoglund•Social Inclusion•2025

  • Advantages and disadvantages of kinship foster care – Perspectives from child welfare workers in Norway

    Open Access•Kristina Jæger Meyer, Jeanette Skoglund et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2026

  • Comparative Research Methods

    Open Access•Frank Esser, Rens Vliegenthart•The International Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • Interpretive Research Design

    Peregrine Schwartz-Shea, Dvora Yanow•Interpretive research design•2013

  • The Emotional and Other Barriers to Kinship Care in Denmark

    Open Access•Bo Morthorst Rasmussen, Sabina Jaeger•Child and Adolescent Social Work…•2021

  • Kinship foster parenting; gender, class and labour-force participation

    Amy Holtan, Renee Th⊘rnblad•European Journal of Social Work•2009

  • Child protection systems within the Danish, Finnish and Norwegian welfare states—time for a child centric approach

    Tarja Pösö, Marit Skivenes et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2013

  • Emotional kinship care and neutral non‐kinship care — the struggle between discourses

    Open Access•Lina Ponnert•Child & Family Social Work•2016

  • The concept of family

    Open Access•Judite Ie•Child & Family Social Work•2022

  • Kinship family foster care

    Open Access•Gary S Cuddeback•Children and Youth Services Review•2004

  • How did kinship care emerge as a significant form of placement for children in care? A comparative study of the experience in Ireland and Scotland

    Open Access•Louise Hill, Robbie Gilligan et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae