Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using surveys in realist evaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID6423953
AuthorsGill Westhorp (0000-0001-8451-2860, Charles Darwin University, corresponding author), Simon Feeny (0000-0002-5955-0045, RMIT University)
Year2024
Volume25
Issue1
Pages45-64
Publication date2024-10-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEvaluation Journal of Australasia (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1035-719X • E-ISSN: 2515-9372
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/1035719x241292083
OpenAlexW4403395853
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited12

Realist evaluation is a theory-based approach to evaluation which examines what works in what respects and to what extent, for whom, in what contexts and how. It focuses on identifying underlying mechanisms which cause outcomes and the contextual factors necessary for their operation. Despite realist evaluation being ‘agnostic’ about methods, qualitative approaches have been heavily favoured in practice. This paper argues that the use of surveys can considerably strengthen standard approaches to realist analysis while still being consistent with the philosophical underpinnings of realist evaluation. It provides examples drawn from various research and evaluation projects. The paper demonstrates that when program theory is well-developed, quantitative data collected through surveys can be used to examine all three elements of realist hypothesis testing: contexts, mechanisms and outcomes. The paper concludes with five principles for the design and analysis of survey data in realist evaluations

Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Psychology

  • Methodological bricolage, data pattern detection and realist explanation

    Open Access•Giel Ton•Evaluation•2025

  • Missing Pieces

    Open Access•J Guenther•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2026

  • Towards defining and advancing storytelling approach in an indigenous realist evaluation

    Open Access•Meshack Nzesei Mutua•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2025

  • Evidence-based Policy

    Ray Pawson•Evidence-based Policy•2006

  • Rameses II reporting standards for realist evaluations

    Open Access•Geoff Wong, Gill Westhorp et al.•BMC Medicine•2016

  • Methods in realist evaluation

    Open Access•Dimitri Renmans, Virginia Castellano Pleguezuelo•Evaluation and Program Planning•2023

  • The Realist Survey

    Open Access•Judith Schoonenboom•Journal of Mixed Methods Research•2015

  • Quantification and realist methodologies

    Wendy Dyer, Malcolm Williams•International Journal of Social…•2020

  • Understanding ‘context’ in realist evaluation and synthesis

    Open Access•Joanne Greenhalgh, Ana Manzano•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • A realist diagnostic workshop

    Open Access•Ray Pawson, Ana Manzano et al.•Evaluation•2012

  • Mobilising Q methodology within a realist evaluation

    Open Access•Kevin Harris, Steven R Henderson et al.•Evaluation•2019

  • Cross-cultural realist interviews

    Open Access•K OʼRourke, Nawal Abdulghani et al.•Evaluation Journal of Australasia•2021

  • A Realist Theory of Science

    Roy Bhaskar•A realist theory of science•2013

  • The craft of interviewing in realist evaluation

    Open Access•Ana Manzano•Evaluation•2016

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae