The right of rebellion in the digital communication age
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6424261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gabriele Giacomini (0000-0001-8482-7643, University of Udine, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 00 |
| Pages | 4-4 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Filozofija i drustvo (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0353-5738 • E-ISSN: 2334-8577 |
| Publisher | National Library of Serbia (PUBLISHER • RS) |
| DOI | 10.2298/fid240428004g |
| OpenAlex | W4414519769 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 18 |
In the seventeenth century, John Locke, while laying the foundations of the liberal system, was the first to theorise the right of rebellion. Within his framework, revolt against an oppressive regime was considered a collective right. However, as recent attempts at revolution under authoritarian regimes have demonstrated, the exercise of this right can prove challenging in the context of digital technologies. Compared to Locke?s era, there are notable developments concerning the motivations, principal actors, and methods of citizen uprisings. Digital technologies have played a significant role not only in facilitating revolts but also in enabling authoritarian restorations. This has underscored the urgency of safeguarding the right to rebellion by updating counterpowers against authoritarian tendencies to address the challenges of the digital age
Cybersecurity and Cyber Warfare Studies · Security, Politics, and Digital Transformation
Cultural Diversity, Non–Western Communities, and Human Rights
New Tools, Old Goals
The Social Affordances of the Internet for Networked Individualism
Why Revolutions Succeed & Fail
The Internet and the Democratization of Civic Culture
Violence and/or Nonviolence in the Success of the Civil Rights Movement
Digital Authoritarianism and the Future of Human Rights
Bowling Alone
Locke's Theory of Revolutionary Action
Injustice
States and Social Revolutions
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |