Conquered Primitives Have No Written Language
Language Revitalization, Reactionary Settler Colonialism, and Perpetual Genocide
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6425522 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gerald Roche (0000-0002-2410-351X, La Trobe University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 145-164 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Genocide Studies International (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2291-1855 • E-ISSN: 2291-1847 |
| Publisher | University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3138/gsi-2024-0011 |
| OpenAlex | W4404948355 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 39 |
Indigenous people in settler colonies such as Australia, the United States, and Canada are currently engaged in a range of projects to revitalize their languages: to reclaim and restore them in the wake of colonial destruction. Such language revitalization is frequently met with fierce backlash. This article examines the relationship between language revitalization backlash and genocide. I argue that language revitalization is part of broader efforts by Indigenous people to reconstitute themselves as distinct groups in reaction to colonial genocides. Backlash against language revitalization can therefore be seen as one element of ongoing efforts to prevent this, leading to a set of social and political relations I call perpetual genocide. I explore the dynamics of language revitalization backlash and perpetual genocide through an analysis of more than 600 social media comments collected from Australia over 2022 and 2023—the opening years of the International Decade of Indigenous Languages—and identify three key themes in these comments: civilizational racism, English and white supremacy, and linguistic diversity as a threat. Based on this analysis, I argue that this backlash, and the perpetual genocide of Indigenous peoples more broadly, is driven by a structural arrangement I call reactionary settler colonialism, which is led by a right-wing vanguard but involves all settlers as implicated subjects. I conclude by discussing counter-genocidal praxis in relation to this formation
Colonialism · Genocide · Indigenous · Indigenous language · Political science · Politics · Racism · Reactionary · Sociology · Gender Studies · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare · Law · Multilingual Education and Policy
The Rhetoric of Reaction
The Implicated Subject
The Reactionary Mind
A Little Matter of Genocide
The Anthropology of Digital Practices
The Anti-Shibboleth
Linguistic genocide 1
The white native speaker and inequality regimes in the private English language school
Money for language
Genocide by Attrition 1939-1993
The Chittagong Hill Tracts
Genocide and the Modern Age
Of linguicide and resistance
Reactionary democracy
The Aboriginal Tent Embassy
Exterminate All The Brutes
Orphans of genocide
An antipodean genocide? The origins of the genocidal moment in the colonization of Australia
Between nationalism and civilizationism
Securing the borders of English and Whiteness
The Slow Violence of Settler Colonialism
Black Power, Aboriginal Genocide, and the Politics of Identity
The Return of Cultural Genocide
Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native
Elimination, Dispossession, Transcendence
Cultural Continuity as a Hedge against Suicide in Canada's First Nations
The Necropolitics of Language Oppression
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |