Provincializing Nature
A Phenomenological Account of Descola’s Relative Universalism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6427906 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gabriel Lago De Sousa Barroso (0000-0002-0492-3158, University of Fribourg, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 489-512 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Human Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0163-8548 • E-ISSN: 1572-851X |
| Publisher | Springer Science+Business Media (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10746-024-09749-y |
| OpenAlex | W4401083055 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 36 |
Anthropologists have recently argued that the divide between nature and culture is not a universal framework suitable for understanding collective behavior but rather a local variation among various ways of composing the experience of the world. Notably, in the case of Philippe Descola’s anthropology, this critique led to a radical reconceptualization of social sciences and the humanities in terms of ontological regimes, which draws upon key aspects of the phenomenological tradition. In this paper, I develop a phenomenological perspective on Descola’s anthropology to clarify whether and how we can assess our engagement with the world beyond the divide between nature and culture. The paper is divided into three sections. In the first section, I present the main claims of Descola’s position, which he calls “relative universalism,” and introduce two critiques of this project: the potential conflation between his ontological framework and aspects of modern naturalism and the risk of reifying cultural determinations as ontological properties. In the second section, I address the first critique by showing how the universalist claim of Descola’s anthropology, according to which collective experience is organized by the duality of planes of physicality and interiority, can be elucidated through Husserl’s account of the embodied experience to avoid a conflation with the naturalist framework. Finally, I contend that anthropology’s idea of a diversity of ontological regimes can be made coherent by analyzing the two layers of the world constitution: the primordial experience of the lived body and the intersubjective process of communalization
Conflation · Embodied cognition · Epistemology · Naturalism · Politics · Sociology · Universalism · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Emile Durkheim and Sociology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Philosophy
Husserl und Die Transzendentale Intersubjektivität
Phenomenological Approaches in Anthropology
Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität
Die Krisis der Europäischen Wissenschaften und die Transzendentale Phänomenologie
Things As They Are
Die Pariser Vorträge
Das Zwischenreich des Dialogs
The Ontological Turn
Anthropologie de la nature
Beyond Nature and Culture
Cognition, Perception and Worlding
La Composition des mondes
Rethinking Relation-Substance Dualism
Experience, Subjectivity, Selfhood
We Have Never Been Modern
The difficult art of composing worlds (and of replying to objections)
Anthropological Epochés
Gesammelte Aufsätze
Disassembling Descola
Back to the future
What is a schema
Anthropology and What There Is
Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism
Transformation transformed
"Radical alterity is just another way of saying "reality
Modes of being and forms of predication
Ontology Is Just Another Word for Culture
On anthropological knowledge
A Naturalist Abroad in the Museum of Ontology
Empathy Beyond the Human. The Social Construction of a Multispecies World
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |