Research on Vertical Professional Collaborative Evaluation Tools of Healthcare System Based on the Tight County Healthcare Alliance in China
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6429690 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ying Zheng (0000-0001-5060-8581, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, corresponding author), Li Li (0000-0001-9700-9682, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College), Jia Hu (0009-0007-9884-8331, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 10-10 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Integrated Care (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1568-4156 • E-ISSN: 1568-4156 |
| Publisher | Ubiquity Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.5334/ijic.8603 |
| PMID | 41244882 |
| OpenAlex | W7104650721 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
The vertical professional collaborative evaluation tools of healthcare system constructed in this paper contain 4 dimensions: (1) Value compatibility and trust, defined as the alignment of health-related values, cultural norms, and behavioral expectations across different provider levels (e.g., primary vs. tertiary care) and specialties (e.g., physicians vs. nurses), operationalized through shared decision-making and perceived reliability; (2) Communication and coordination mechanisms, encompassing systems for bidirectional information flow (e.g., standardized referral protocols, interoperable IT platforms) and procedural safeguards to enable cross-disciplinary collaboration; (3) Incentive and constraint mechanisms, referring to policy tools (financial/non-financial rewards, accountability metrics) designed to motivate or regulate collaborative behaviors; and (4) Structure and strength of collaborative relationships, characterized by the topology (e.g., network centrality) and resilience of inter-provider connections, measured through interaction frequency and resource-sharing patterns.,; 8 factors and 15 items whose overall reliability and validity were good and has certain applicability in China. Given regional sociocultural diversity, the findings require validation through broader case studies
Accountability · Alliance · Collaborative network · Health care · Healthcare system · Incentive · Integrated care · Interoperability · Operationalization · Summative assessment · Educational Reforms and Innovations · Medical Research and Treatments · Regional Development and Environment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |