Humanitarian logics in the evolution of international society

Bibliographic Data

ID6430660
AuthorsOlivia Nantermoz (0000-0003-1712-6008, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author), Aslihan Turan (0000-0002-3666-8438, Universitat Oberta de Catalunya)
Year2023
Volume62
Issue1
Pages197-216
Publication date2023-09-14
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Politics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1384-5748 • E-ISSN: 1740-3898
PublisherPalgrave Macmillan (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1057/s41311-023-00509-w
OpenAlexW4386741817
LanguageEN
References cited47

This paper argues that humanitarian logics have been integral to the constitution and historical evolution of international society and its primary institutions. Whilst Watson was chiefly interested in the raison de système which brought states together in the consolidation and preservation of an international society, he did not dedicate as much attention to how humanitarian concerns have historically been embedded in the structure of both statehood and international society. We introduce the concept of raison de l’humanité to capture this fundamental concern for protecting human lives, alleviating human suffering and mobilising compassion and solidarity in politics. We show how this raison de l’humanité has historically complemented and reinforced (rather than undermined) the workings of international society and its raison de système . We illustrate this argument by examining the humanitarian responsibilities historically associated with sovereignty and their contemporary expression in the responsibility to protect (R2P) doctrine. Instead of uncritically celebrating this raison de l’humanité as a universal and morally progressive force in global politics, however, this paper stresses the need to attend to the hierarchies, exclusions and sacrifices produced by appeals to humanity and humanitarian logics. Taking this raison de l’humanité seriously therefore requires tracing how throughout history, appeals to humanity have oscillated between solidarity and violence, inclusion and exclusion, equality and hierarchy. This brings us back, in turn, to Watson’s project of historical documentation of the varying workings of international society

Environmental ethics · Humanitarian intervention · Humanity · International law · International relations · Political science · Politics · Responsibility to Protect · Sociology · Solidarity · Sovereignty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access