Asymmetric relations and systemic misperceptions
Why and how Australia and China talk past each other
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6430686 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Guangyi Pan (0000-0002-8398-242X, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 25 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 39-75 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Relations of the Asia-Pacific (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-482X • E-ISSN: 1470-4838 |
| Publisher | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/irap/lcae009 |
| OpenAlex | W4403573322 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 51 |
Caught by conflicts, both Australia and China exhibited confused attitudes towards each other’s motives. For China, despite the common interests of strong economic and trade complementarities, Australia acts as a vassal state of the USA, campaigning against China for no reason. For Canberra, it has been frustrated by China’s ignorance of Australia’s independent position and concerns. This article explores the fundamental cause behind this misperception, arguing that asymmetric relationships lead two countries to put their attention on different levels, generating misinterpretations from both sides. As a great power, China concentrates on worldwide competition with the USA and prioritizes its global strategy while underplaying concerns of Australia. However, in Australia’s agenda, regional security and China’s expansion deepened its anxiety, so its over-attention spotlighted Beijing’s moves in a sensitive scenario. The asymmetry exacerbates each other’s threats. The article provides a systematic explanation of the China–Australia tension and clarifies the mechanism behind asymmetric relations
Beijing · China · Competition (biology · Development economics · Economics · Ignorance · Political economy · Political science · Position (finance · Commonwealth, Australian Politics and Federalism · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Island Studies and Pacific Affairs · Law
System Effects
China and the US Alliance System
Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics
China and Vietnam
China 2035
The Gathering Storm
Counting On China? Australia's Strategic Response to Economic Interdependence
From Keeping a Low Profile to Striving for Achievement
Chinese Values vs. Liberalism
China's “Major Country Diplomacy”
Between Balancing and Bandwagoning
The changing architecture of politics in the Asia-Pacific
Shrinking room for hedging
Middle power hedging in the era of security/economic disconnect
It’s not the size, it’s the relationship
When the Kangaroo Encounters the Flying Dragon
Realistic Relations? How the Evolving Bilateral Relationship is Understood in China and Australia
Motivation behind China’s ‘One Belt, One Road’ Initiatives and Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank
Politics of Accommodation of the Rise of China
The Domestic Politics of the Belt and Road Initiative and its Implications
How Do Weaker States Hedge? Unpacking Asean states’ alignment behavior towards China
How China attempts to drive a wedge in the U.S.-Australia alliance
The dilemma of interdependence
Asymmetry of power and attention in alliance politics
An ally for all the years to come’
Transition from hedging to balancing in Australia’s China policy
The return of values in Australian foreign policy
A frame analysis of political-media discourse on the Belt and Road Initiative
China–Australia strategic partnership in the context of China’s grand peripheral diplomacy
Australia and the China Threat
The transformation of asymmetry
Deputy sheriff or independent ally? Evolving Australian–American ties in an ambiguous world order
Gramsci, Hegemony and International Relations
China’s ‘New Silk Roads’
Asymmetry and systemic misperception
The Essence of Hedging
Regime Insecurity and International Cooperation
Adapt or atrophy? The Australia-U.S. alliance in an age of power transition
Overstepping Down Under
The Struggle for Certainty
The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations
China's 'new type of Great Power relations
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |