Law, time, and (in)justice after empire
Germany's objection to colonial reparations and the chronopolitics of deflection
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6431074 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sinja Graf (0000-0002-6678-4018, London School of Economics and Political Science, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 1-28 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1752-9719 • E-ISSN: 1752-9727 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1752971924000113 |
| OpenAlex | W4406335082 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 52 |
Debates on reparations for colonial atrocities highlight the relationship between international law, political time, and (in)justice. This paper examines Germany's foreclosure of reparation claims raised by descendants of survivors of its 1904–8 colonial genocide. The analysis draws on parliamentary interpellation records (1989–2021) around the question of German reparations to Namibia's Ovaherero and Nama. I argue that Germany mobilizes temporal rules of international law, especially the non-retroactivity of the Genocide Convention, to deflect from such claims. This strategy first confines the political question of colonial reparations to the international legal realm, only to then invalidate it via the temporal rule of law's non-retroactivity. I argue that this strategy enables a ‘chronopolitics of deflection’, by which Germany has pointed away from colonial reparations while directing attention to development assistance payments to Namibia. The paper relates these findings to theories of political time, arguing that Germany's reliance on the non-retroactivity of the Genocide Convention yields what I call a ‘projection of history as normatively temporalized time’. The paper concludes with critiques of the relationship between international law and colonial reparations, arguing that current invocations of inter-temporal and non-retroactive international law implicitly reiterate colonial law, thereby locking in place an unjust legal past
Colonialism · Convention · Genocide · German · International law · Political science · Politics · Realm · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · History · International Law and Human Rights · Law
Das Völkerrecht als Instrument der Wiedergutmachung? - Eine kritische Betrachtung am Beispiel des Herero-Aufstandes
Reparations
The Oxford Handbook of Intergenerational Ethics
International Justice and the Politics of Sentimentality
Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law
Justice and Reconciliation in World Politics
Time and World Politics
Historical Injustice and Reparation
Superseding Historic Injustice
Minimum Legal Standards in Reparation Processes for Colonial Crimes
Empires Without Imperialism
History, Memory, and State-Sponsored Violence
Decolonising International Law
Reconsidering Reparations
Reparations for Chattel Slavery
Reparations for Historical Human Rights Violations
The Nuremberg Trial and its Impact on Germany
Addressing 'Colonial Crimes' through Reparations
Tears of the Olive Trees
How to Illegalize Past Injustice
Affective Justice
The expressive turn of international criminal justice
Should German Courts Prosecute Syrian International Crimes? Revisiting the “Dual Foundation” Thesis
Retroactive Law and Proactive Justice
The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–1965
Responsibility for Past Injustice
Colonialism, genocide and International Relations
Reparations for the Herero Genocide
Counter-hegemonic International Law
The Time of Slavery
The Past Is Evil/Evil Is Past
Time, Presence, and Historical Injustice
Writing the Past Out of the Present
The chronopolitics of racial time
Politics and the Past
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |