Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Alluvial gold’ in Bronze Age Egypt and Nubia

From Placers or Clasts, and Why It Matters

Bibliographic Data

ID6433283
AuthorsLeigh Bettenay (0000-0001-6531-0550, The University of Western Australia, corresponding author), James Ro (0000-0003-2757-4939, The University of Western Australia), JAMES ROSS (0000-0003-3022-5625)
Year2025
Volume69
Pages105485-105485
Publication date2025-11-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Archaeological Science Reports (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2352-409X • E-ISSN: 2352-4103
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.jasrep.2025.105485
OpenAlexW4416404714
LanguageEN
References cited29

‘alluvial gold mining’ has two meanings, but only in the context of archaeological studies of Bronze Age Nubia. • proposed clast mining in Nubia contrasts with alluvial placer mining dominant in goldfields globally. • alluvial placer mining of detrital gold can yield artefacts containing PGE alloys. • ‘alluvial clast mining’ only yields gold like the source lode, hence no PGE alloys. • PGE alloys are common in Bronze age gold artefacts, so placer mining was the dominant mining method. We highlight a significant divergence of opinion within the research community focussed on Bronze Age Nubia, about alluvial gold mining processes. Some interpret ‘alluvial gold mining’ in the globally accepted context to describe placer mining, which is the recovery of detrital gold particles simply by washing or ‘dry-blowing’. Placer mining also recovers other heavy minerals and can yield gold containing platinum group element (PGE) alloy inclusions if (and only if) primary sources for gold and PGE exist in the drainage catchment, so that they can be co-deposited into placer deposits during turbulent water flow. By contrast, other researchers interpret ‘alluvial gold mining’ or ‘wadi workings’ in a globally unique way, namely the visual recognition and selective extraction for processing of distinctive gold-bearing quartz fragments from alluvium, while discarding the rest. We call this ‘alluvial clast mining’. It yields gold that mimics the source lode and will lack PGE alloy inclusions unless present in the gold lode, which is unlikely and contrary to universally-accepted interpretations. Hence, although inclusions of PGE alloys in gold artefacts are generally interpreted to indicate an ’alluvial gold’ source, in fact only one of the two forms of alluvial mining, namely alluvial placer mining, can yield these. Since PGE alloy inclusions are common in Bronze Age Egyptian gold artefacts then some or all host gold was sourced by alluvial placer mining , as alluvial placer gold , from a catchment containing a primary PGE source. If inclusions are absent, both the source and mining method are equivocal: from primary gold lodes; from alluvial clast mining; or from placers in locations without a PGE source. Precise terminology matters.

Alluvium · Bronze · Bronze Age · Context (archaeology) · Gold mining · Lode · Placer deposit · Placer mining · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Geochemistry and Elemental Analysis

  • The analysis of platinum-group element inclusions in gold antiquities

    Open Access•N D MEEKS, Nigel Meeks et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•1980

  • On the Invention of Gold Metallurgy

    Open Access•Verena Leusch, Barbara Armbruster et al.•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae