Element network analysis
A method for exploring the syntax of abstract decoration on artefacts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6433288 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rie Bloch (Aarhus University, corresponding author), Niels N Johannsen (0000-0003-3550-2548, Aarhus University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Pages | 104959-104959 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-05 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Archaeological Science Reports (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2352-409X • E-ISSN: 2352-4103 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104959 |
| OpenAlex | W4406080367 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 31 |
non-figurative) decoration is ubiquitous in human material culture, yet understanding its cultural purpose or role in specific contexts remains a key challenge for archaeology and other disciplines studying material decoration and art. Arguably, identifying basic structures in abstract decoration by applying formal methods is a useful prerequisite for proceeding to well-grounded interpretation of its role in a given cultural context. It may also inform intermediate, middle-range analyses, such as experimental work. We present a new, network-analytical method designed to identify basic structures in decoration, such as relations between decorative elements, the centrality rank of individual elements included in a given pattern or other relational structures hypothesized to be significant to the perceptual and cognitive effects of a pattern. To demonstrate its use and potential, we apply the method to pottery of the Neolithic Funnel Beaker/TRB period in southern Scandinavia (4000–2600 BCE), which exhibits elaborate abstract decoration. While most formal studies of ceramic morphology and decoration in archaeology have focused on typology and chronology, we argue that structures identified using this method can be used to explore the syntax of decorative patterns, which may reflect underlying aesthetic, ideological and social preferences. Applying network analyses to materially static patterns of decoration differs fundamentally from previous applications of formal network theory and modelling in archaeology, and faces different challenges. In addition to demonstrating the former in practice, we address the potentials and problems of this novel application and discuss its relevance in the wider study of material culture
Archaeology · Element (criminal law · Geography · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Political science · Syntax · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Computer Science · Data Visualization and Analytics · Design Education and Practice · Philosophy
Structure and cognition in art
Social Network Analysis
Stylistic Variation in Prehistoric Ceramics
Symbols in action
Some Marketing Models for Romano-British Coarse Pottery
Network Analysis In Archaeology New Approaches To Regional Interaction
Ideology, Power and Prehistory
Thinking Through Networks
Networks in Archaeology
Connecting the Dots
Perspectives on an Early Bronze Age Island Centre
Sarup Revisited
Class and Committees in a Norwegian Island Parish
Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions
Networks and nodal points
Cultural Transmission and Stochastic Network Growth
Social Network Analysis in Archaeology
The Strength of Weak Ties
Social networks and the study of relations
Archaeologiques of sight
Let's start with something Small
Archeological insights into hominin cognitive evolution
| Highly cited | No |
|---|