Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Unleashing generative AI

Funding implications and insights from China

Bibliographic Data

ID6433799
AuthorsJiwei Qian (0000-0002-4031-0287, National University of Singapore, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume18
Issue2
Pages431-454
Publication date2024-07-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Asian Public Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1751-6242 • E-ISSN: 1751-6234
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17516234.2024.2381549
OpenAlexW4400867274
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited8

The funding of scientific research is a critical concern for universities. Although the peer-review grants system promotes competition and research excellence, it is resource-intensive and disadvantageous for junior faculty members. Conversely, the block grants system offers an alternative, enabling universities to nurture talent and sustain long-term research. The rise of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) is transforming university research and intensifying funding competition, necessitating a re-evaluation of the balance between peer-review and block grants systems. This paper advocates for a mixed funding system, with a greater emphasis on the block grants system, to establish an effective approach in supporting diverse research pursuits in the GAI era. By recalibrating the balance between peer-review and block grants, this proposed system aims to alleviate administrative burdens while providing a dependable foundation for early-career scholars. However, empirically substantiating this argument is challenging due to the recent emergence of GAI with insufficient data. To address this, we examine China's science and technology system, which has recently experienced a significant increase in research grant applications. This case study offers insights into GAI's potential effects on research funding. Our analysis contributes to the ongoing debate on optimal research funding strategies in the face of rapid technological change

China · Economic growth · Economics · Generative grammar · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Innovation Policy and RD · Law · Public Administration · Artificial Intelligence

  • How policy advocacy shapes public supportive behavior tendencies in urban smart transformation

    Yingwei Wang, Hong Pan•Journal of Chinese Governance•2025

  • Riding the tide of generative artificial intelligence in higher education policy

    Giliberto Capano, Alex Jingwei He et al.•Journal of Asian Public Policy•2025

  • Peerless science

    Daryl E Chubin•Peerless science•1990

  • Incentives and creativity

    Open Access•Pierre Azoulay, Joshua Graff Zivin et al.•The RAND Journal of Economics•2011

  • Constructing Organizations

    Open Access•Nils Brunsson, Kerstin Sahlin-Andersson et al.•Organization Studies•2000

  • Race, Ethnicity, and NIH Research Awards

    Open Access•Donna K Ginther, Walter T Schaffer et al.•Science•2011

  • Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Hanchen Wang, Tianfan Fu et al.•Nature•2023

  • Governing Science

    Open Access•Jochen Gläser, Grit Laudel•European Journal of Sociology•2016

  • The Evolution of a National Research Funding System

    Open Access•Kaare Aagaard•Minerva•2017

  • Out of One, Many

    Open Access•Lisa P Argyle, Ethan C Busby et al.•Political Analysis•2023

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae