Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Qualitative Analysis of the #MeToo Online Sphere

Bibliographic Data

ID6434201
AuthorsRoselyn Peterson (0000-0002-0432-186X, Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA, corresponding author), Elizabeth Mayer (0009-0001-1459-1492, Department of Psychiatry Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA), Prachi H Bhuptani (0000-0003-4316-0947, Department of Psychiatry Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA), Reina Kiefer (0000-0002-8314-5074, Department of Psychology University of Rhode Island Kingston Rhode Island USA), Margarita Cruz‐sánchez (0009-0000-0783-8656, The Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA), Ellie Kim (0000-0003-2514-8936, Department of Psychiatry Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA), Lindsay M Orchowski (0000-0001-9048-3576, Department of Psychiatry Rhode Island Hospital Providence Rhode Island USA)
Year2025
Volume35
Issue4
Publication date2025-06-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/casp.70128
OpenAlexW4411432825
LanguageEN
References cited37

MeToo ‘went viral’ in 2017 as a way for survivors of sexual victimisation to share their experience and raise awareness of sexual victimisation. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals has yet to be examined qualitatively. The current study describes survivors' perceptions about the impacts of #MeToo. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 51 participants with histories of sexual victimisation who either disclosed ( n = 37 [20 in person, 17 online and in person]) or did not disclose ( n = 14); M age = 29.6 (SD = 7.92) years old, cisgender female (82.4%), non‐White (22.3%) and heterosexual (48.9%). Thematic analysis revealed both positive and negative perceived impacts of the #MeToo online sphere in accordance with the social‐ecological model. Results are categorised into the following groups: Individual level factors: (1) increased awareness of prevalence, and (2) lack of belonging; Interpersonal level factors: (3) facilitation of conversations, and (4) negative conversations about sexual victimisation; Community level factors: (5) increased feeling of community, connection and empowerment; and Policy level factors: (6) need for access to more tangible resources, and (7) backlash of #MeToo. No themes fell in the ‘Institutional level factors’ group of the SEM model. How #MeToo impacted the wellbeing of individuals at various levels (individual, interpersonal, community and policy level) is discussed

Developmental psychology · Empowerment · Environmental health · Feeling · Interpersonal communication · Poison control · Political science · Qualitative research · Sociology · Suicide prevention · Thematic analysis · Victimisation · Clinical Psychology · Gender, Feminism, and Media · Medicine · Psychology · Sex work and related issues · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies · Social Psychology

  • Applied Thematic Analysis

    Greg Guest, Kathleen Macqueen et al.•Applied Thematic Analysis•2012

  • “I never told anyone until the #metoo movement”

    Open Access•Ramona Alaggia, Susan Wang•Child Abuse & Neglect•2020

  • Ecological systems theory.

    Urie Bronfenbrenner•Encyclopedia of Psychology Volume 3•2000

  • To Tell or Not to Tell

    Courtney E Ahrens, Janna Stansell et al.•Violence and Victims•2010

  • Social Reactions to Rape Victims

    Rebecca Campbell, Courtney E Ahrens et al.•Violence and Victims•2001

  • Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects

    Andrew K Shenton•Education for Information•2004

  • Toward good practice in thematic analysis

    Braun, Victoria Clarke•International Journal of…•2023

  • Talking about sexual assault

    Sarah E Ullman•Talking about sexual assault•2010

  • Online Disclosure of Sexual Victimization

    Open Access•Marleen Gorissen, Chantal J W van den Berg et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2023

  • Women's self‐defense and sexual assault resistance

    Open Access•Jocelyn A Hollander•Sociology Compass•2018

  • Posting the story of your sexual assault online

    Kristin K Gundersen, Kristen Zaleski•Feminist Media Studies•2020

  • To Whom Do College Women Confide Following Sexual Assault? A Prospective Study of Predictors of Sexual Assault Disclosure and Social Reactions

    Open Access•Lindsay M Orchowski, Christine A Gidycz•Violence Against Women•2012

  • Does Self-Defense Training Prevent Sexual Violence Against Women

    Open Access•Jocelyn A Hollander•Violence Against Women•2014

  • Tweeting rape culture

    Open Access•Megan Stubbs-Richardson, Nicole E Rader et al.•Feminism & Psychology•2018

  • Revising the SES

    Open Access•Mary P Ko, Antonia Abbey et al.•Psychology of Women Quarterly•2007

  • Sexual Assault Resistance Education’s Benefits for Survivors of Attempted and Completed Rape

    Open Access•Charlene Y Senn, Paula C Barata et al.•Women & Therapy•2021

  • Shifting the Rape Script

    Rachel Loney-Howes, Rachel Loney-Howes Rachel Loney-Howes•Frontiers A Journal of Women…•2018

  • Disclosing Sexual Assault Within Social Networks

    Open Access•Emily R Dworkin, Samantha L Pittenger et al.•American Journal of Community…•2016

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • MeToo and the Politics of Social Change

    Rachel Loney-Howes Bianca Fileborn, Bianca Fileborn et al.•#MeToo and the Politics of Social…•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae