The Contestation of National Adaptation Policies in Indonesia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6434912 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stanislaus Risadi Apresian (0000-0001-9291-8334, University of Leeds, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 72-101 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-13 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1868-1034 • E-ISSN: 1868-4882 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/18681034241290815 |
| OpenAlex | W4404329539 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 38 |
Indonesia actively supports the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change to achieve the Global Goal on Adaptation by setting ambitious climate change adaptation pledges in its Nationally Determined Contributions. This paper explores the implementation of those adaptation commitments within a polycentric governance structure in Indonesia. There is a debate about whether polycentric institutions help or hinder the effectiveness of adaptation outcomes. The question remains, why is the implementation of climate change adaptation policies in Indonesia ineffective? This paper argues that the contestation between the National Development Planning Agency and the Ministry of Environment and Forestry, as two dominant ministries in adaptation, has beset the polycentric structure of adaptation governance in Indonesia and resulted in ineffective adaptation policy implementation. Moreover, the polycentric adaptation governance is ineffective because Indonesia is still facing problems in coordination, collaboration, policy learning, leadership, resource distribution, and dispersion of power
Adaptation (eye · Development economics · Economics · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Asian Studies and History · Psychology · Public Administration
Politicizing vulnerability and adaptation
Discourse Coalitions and the Australian Climate Change Policy Network
An international comparison of four polycentric approaches to climate and energy governance
Skype interviewing
Beyond Markets and States
Polycentricity in practice
Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change
Can national policy blockages accelerate the development of polycentric governance? Evidence from climate change policy in the United Kingdom
Towards endogenous disasters and climate adaptation policy making in Indonesia
Governance Obstacles to Geothermal Energy Development in Indonesia
Climate policy integration in the land use sector
Redd+ in Indonesia
The Application of ‘Elite Interviewing’ Methodology in Transdisciplinary Research
Multi-level governance and power in climate change policy networks
Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia
Interprovincial Wealth Inequality by Factor Components in Indonesia
The Organization of Government in Metropolitan Areas
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |