Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Towards New Futures for Archaeological Data Production

Challenging Archaeonormativity through Storytelling

Datos Bibliográficos

ID6435566
AutoresSara Perry (0000-0002-9694-000X, University College London), Anna Simandiraki‐grimshaw (0000-0002-1107-4991, University College London), C Morgan (0000-0001-6907-5535, University of York), James Stuart Taylor (0000-0003-3466-9581, University of York), Aida Fadioui (0000-0002-5900-7376, University of Antwerp), Lise Foket (0000-0001-5149-1346, University of Antwerp), Piraye Hacıgüzeller (0000-0002-8227-2901, University of Antwerp), Despoina Vasiliki Sampatakou (0000-0002-6101-7354, University of Glasgow), Paola Derudas (0000-0003-2700-4143, Lund University), Holly Wright (0000-0002-3403-4159, University of York), A F Clough (0000-0002-3471-113X, University of Bristol)
Año2025
Volumen50
Número8
Páginas796-815
Fecha de publicación2025-05-27
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Field Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0093-4690 • E-ISSN: 2042-4582
EditorialTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00934690.2025.2504235
OpenAlexW4410767886
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas7
Referencias citadas68

Archaeologists create vast amounts of specialized data, which are often difficult to access, maintain, and reuse, even for practitioners themselves. In this article, we explore the implication of professional practices of data production in fueling archaeonormativity—i.e., the naturalization of behaviors and structures in archaeology that strip it of affect and meaning and that deny human (and non-human) agency and equity. We contend that storytelling with archaeological data-making, grounded in a narrative hermeneutic model, has promise for subverting the current archaeonormative establishment. Via experimentation on the cross-European Transforming Data Reuse in Archaeology project, we discuss the challenges of intervening in excavation and post-excavation activities through storytelling, from siloing of results to epistemic anxieties to destabilization of trust, leadership, and institutional authority. Nurturing creative, “story-critical” risk-taking in the course of archaeological data production may enable archaeologists to improve their own working contexts whilst also (re)distributing power inside and outside the profession

Archaeology · Art · Business · Economics · Futures contract · Literature · Narrative · Production (economics · Storytelling · Archaeological Research and Protection · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · Digital and Traditional Archives Management · History

  • Wicked Problems for Archaeologists – Heritage as Transformative Practice

    Andrea Bradley, Kate Geary et al.

  • Digital Archaeological Data in the Creative Industries

    Open Access•Rimvydas Laužikas, Indrė Jovaišaitė-Blaževičienė et al.•Internet Archaeology•2026

  • Building Data Models for Archaeology

    Open Access•Aida Fadioui•Internet Archaeology•2026

  • Developing Trust Through Participatory Archaeologies

    Open Access•L Harald Fredheim, Harald Fredheim•Current Swedish Archaeology•2026

  • Methodological Habitus

    Jordi Armani Rivera Prince, Kylie E Quave et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2026

  • A Discussion of Current Risk and Future Reward

    Guillermo Díaz De Liaño, Sadie Watson•Journal of Field Archaeology•2026

  • Archaeology as Worldbuilding

    Open Access•C Morgan•Cambridge Archaeological Journal•2025

  • Designs for the Pluriverse

    Arturo Escobar•Designs for the Pluriverse•2018

  • The Ethics of Storytelling

    Hanna Meretoja•Ethics of Storytelling•2018

  • Design Justice

    Open Access•Sasha Costanza-Chock, Sasha Costanza‐chock•Design Justice•2020

  • In small things forgotten

    James Deetz•In small things forgotten•1977

  • Virtually Real or Really Virtual

    Open Access•Jeremy Huggett•Studies in Digital Heritage•2020

  • The Unethical Enterprise of the Past

    Open Access•E Parga Dans, Pablo Alonso González•Journal of Business Ethics•2021

  • Alienation and Redemption

    Open Access•Jake Weekes, Sadie Watson et al.•Theoretical Roman Archaeology…•2019

  • Making Archaeology Happen. Design versus Dogma

    Open Access•Antonio Vizcaíno Estevan•AP: Online Journal in Public…•2016

  • Imaginary, but by no means unimaginable

    James G Gibbs, James G Gibb•Historical Archaeology•2000

  • Whose global village? rethinking how technology shapes our world

    Fu Tao, Tao Fu•Information Communication & Society•2019

  • Critical Approaches to Fieldwork

    Gavin Lucas•Critical Approaches to Fieldwork•2001

  • Why Are Heritage Interpreters Voiceless at the Trowel's Edge? A Plea for Rewriting the Archaeological Workflow

    Open Access•Sara Perry•Advances in Archaeological Practice•2018

  • Worlding Excavation Practices

    Open Access•Kevin Pijpers•Open Archaeology•2021

  • A Manifesto for an Introspective Digital Archaeology

    Open Access•Jeremy Huggett•Open Archaeology•2015

  • Figurations of Digital Practice, Craft, and Agency in Two Mediterranean Fieldwork Projects

    Open Access•Zachary Batist, Val Masters et al.•Open Archaeology•2021

  • Skeuomorphism in Digital Archeological Practice

    Open Access•James Stuart Taylor, Nicolò Dell’unto•Open Archaeology•2021

  • Materializing Media Archaeologies

    Sara Perry, C Morgan•Journal of Contemporary Archaeology•2015

  • Beyond Art/Archaeology

    Antonia S Thomas, Daniel Lee et al.•Journal of Contemporary Archaeology•2018

  • Should Archaeology Have a Future

    Louann Wurst•Journal of Contemporary Archaeology•2019

  • Dig Houses, Dwelling, and Knowledge Production in Archaeology

    C Morgan, Daniel Eddisford•Journal of Contemporary Archaeology•2015

  • Archaeology and Capitalism

    James Doeser•Public Archaeology•2008

  • Archaeology and the Moving Image

    Open Access•C Morgan•Public Archaeology•2014

  • Degrowth, anti-capitalism or post-archaeology? A response to Nicolas Zorzin

    Open Access•Louann Wurst•Archaeological Dialogues•2021

  • Post-processualism, professionalization and archaeological methodologies. Towards reflective and radical practice

    Open Access•Adrian M Chadwick, Adrian Chadwick•Archaeological Dialogues•2003

  • Making Sense of Gender, Age, Power and Disciplinary Position

    Open Access•Dorte Marie Søndergaard•Feminism & Psychology•2005

  • Cultivating trust, producing knowledge

    Open Access•Allison Mickel, Nylah Byrd•History of the Human Sciences•2021

  • Introduction

    Adrian Praetzellis•Historical Archaeology•1998

  • Excavation is Destruction Digitization

    Open Access•Christopher H Roosevelt, Peter J Cobb et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2015

  • The Proximity of Communities to the Expanse of Big Data

    Open Access•Allison Mickel•Journal of Field Archaeology•2020

  • Drawing and Knowledge Construction in Archaeology

    Open Access•C Morgan, Helen Petrie et al.•Journal of Field Archaeology•2021

  • Single-Context Recording, Field Interpretation and Reflexivity

    Gustavo Sandoval•Journal of Field Archaeology•2021

  • Single Context Archaeology as Anarchist Praxis

    C Morgan, Daniel Eddisford•Journal of Contemporary Archaeology•2019

  • Archaeologies of the Heart

    Open Access•Society for American Archaeology, World Archaeological Congress Kyoto et al.•Archaeologies of the Heart•2020

  • Narrative Agency and the Critical Potential of Metanarrative Reading Groups

    Hanna Meretoja, Eevastiina Kinnunen et al.•Poetics Today•2022

  • Handle with care

    Open Access•J P Gill, Catriona J Mckenzie et al.•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2018

  • Slow Archaeology, Punk Archaeology, and the ‘Archaeology of Care

    Open Access•William Caraher•European Journal of Archaeology•2019

  • EmboDIYing Disruption

    Open Access•Katherine M Cook•European Journal of Archaeology•2019

  • The Enchantment of the Archaeological Record

    Open Access•Sara Perry•European Journal of Archaeology•2019

  • Archaeological (Digital) Maps as Performances

    Piraye Hacıgüzeller•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2017

  • I'll Tell You What I Want, What I Really, Really Want! Open Archaeology that Is Collaborative, Participatory, Public, and Feminist

    Rachael Kiddey•Norwegian Archaeological Review•2020

  • More than the Name of the Rose

    Open Access•Marieke Van Erp, William Tullett et al.•The American Historical Review•2023

  • How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back

    Open Access•A Wylie•Science Technology & Human Values•2017

  • Critical Approaches to the Storytelling Boom

    Maarit Mäkelä, Maria Mäkelä et al.•Poetics Today•2022

  • Whither archaeologists? Continuing challenges to field practice

    Open Access•Sadie Watson•Antiquity•2019

  • Between Certainty and Trust

    Open Access•Pablo Alonso González•Cultural Sociology•2016

  • Doing Gender

    Open Access•Candace West, Don H Zimmerman•Gender & Society•1987

  • Development and Disciplinary Complicity

    Cristóbal Gnecco•Annual Review of Anthropology•2018

  • Current Digital Archaeology

    C Morgan•Annual Review of Anthropology•2022

  • Affective Presence

    Open Access•Cara Krmpotich, Alexander Somerville•Museum Anthropology•2016

  • Assembling "Effective Archaeologies" toward Equitable Futures

    Open Access•A B Stahl•American Anthropologist•2020

  • Finding the fun

    Open Access•Aris Politopoulos, Angus A A Mol et al.•Archaeological Dialogues•2023

  • Degrowth in development-led archaeology and opportunities for change. A comment on Zorzin

    Open Access•Sadie Watson•Archaeological Dialogues•2021

  • Degrowth and a sustainable future for archaeology

    Open Access•J L Flexner•Archaeological Dialogues•2020

  • Heritage in danger. The collapse of commercial archaeology in Spain

    Open Access•E Parga Dans•Archaeological Dialogues•2019

  • Excavation methodologies and labour as epistemic concerns in the practice of archaeology. Comparing examples from British and Andean archaeology

    Open Access•Mark Leighton, Mary Leighton•Archaeological Dialogues•2015

Obras citantes distintas7
Citas por año7
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae