Multistakeholderism and Human Rights
A Call for an Anthropological Approach
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6435985 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Matthew Canfield (0000-0003-3543-7563), Sara L M Davis (0000-0003-0914-3529) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 17 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-03-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Journal of Human Rights Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1757-9619 • E-ISSN: 1757-9627 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/jhuman/huaf003 |
| OpenAlex | W4409030136 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 48 |
Multistakeholder processes (MSPs) are fast becoming the primary form of collaboration across many fields of global governance. Proponents argue MSPs enable meaningful participation, transparency, and collective ownership of decisions, while critics claim they dilute state accountability and empower private actors at the expense of the public good. To date, however, there has been little study of the experience of civil society and community advocates who participate in these processes in order to promote human rights, and what these advocates see as the merits or shortfalls of different forms of multistakeholderism. Drawing on socio-legal and anthropological studies, as well as our experiences as scholar-activists within MSPs, this paper foregrounds the role of civil society representatives. We argue that an ethnographic approach to studying MSPs can provide more nuanced, empirically grounded insights into the evolving relationship between human rights and global governance. We propose three areas for greater research: (1) how MSPs shape the subjectivities of civil society participants and how this may produce new transnational constituencies; (2) how participants in MSPs use aesthetic and affective aspects of human rights to exercise moral power; and, (3) how MSPs afford civil society and social movements the opportunity to transform the meanings of human rights
Human rights · Political science · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · Human Rights and Development · International Development and Aid · Law
The Subject of Human Rights
Affective States
International Law from Below
Rules without Rights
Governance and the transformation of political representation
Global Rule-Setting for Business
Reinventing Human Rights
Human Rights from Below
The Uncounted
The Practice of Human Rights
Human Rights and Gender Violence
Power in global governance
Regulatory Translations
The bureaucratisation of utopia
Causal versus Constitutive Explanations (or, On the Difficulty of Being so Positive…)
Multistakeholderism
Are Equity and Sustainability a Likely Outcome When Foxes and Chickens Share the Same Coop? Critiquing the Concept of Multistakeholder Governance of Food Security
Excluding through inclusion
Stakeholder Perceptions of the Environmental Effectiveness of Multi-stakeholder Initiatives
Introduction to the symposium
New mechanisms of participation in extractive governance
Do Human Rights Matter in Bilateral Aid Allocation? A Quantitative Analysis of 21 Donor Countries
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Legitimacy in Global Health Governance
Democratizing Global Environmental Governance? Stakeholder Democracy after the World Summit on Sustainable Development
Food sovereignty and convergence spaces
Disputing the Global Land Grab
The Gates Foundation, global health and domination
Undoing the Demos
Transnational Human Rights and Local Activism
The age of responsibilization
Repoliticising multi-stakeholder standards processes
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |