A moderated mediation analysis of the impact of Facebook network heterogeneity on affective polarization among ethnic groups in Afghanistan
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 6436174 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Qurban Hussain Pamirzad (0009-0000-0478-1842), Ghulam Ahmad Susyall, Abdul Bais Hakimi |
| Año | 2025 |
| Volumen | 23 |
| Número | 3 |
| Páginas | 415-432 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-05-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Information Communication and Ethics in Society (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 1758-8871 • E-ISSN: 1477-996X |
| Editorial | Emerald Publishing Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1108/jices-01-2025-0013 |
| OpenAlex | W4410381266 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 56 |
Purpose This study aims to investigate the association between Facebook network heterogeneity and affective polarization among ethnic groups in Afghanistan. In addition, through a moderated mediation model, it explores the indirect impact of network heterogeneity on affective polarization. Design/methodology/approach A cross-sectional survey ( n = 417), inclusive of diverse ethnic groups among students at Badakhshan and Kabul universities, was administered, and the data were used to test the hypothesized moderated mediation model. Findings The findings demonstrate that Facebook network heterogeneity has depolarizing potential in a multiethnic context. It was also found that while diverse content exposure did not directly predict affective polarization, it positively mediated the impact of network heterogeneity on affective polarization. Moreover, the effect of diverse content exposure on affective polarization was moderated by public knowledge acquisition. The findings highlight two depolarizing mechanisms of Facebook network heterogeneity: it contributes to the connection among different ethnic groups, fostering positive contact, and provides diverse information that enhances public knowledge, augmenting mutual understanding among ethnic groups. Originality/value The rise of polarization, particularly political polarization among parties in developed nations, and its association with social media have attracted numerous scholars. However, the association between other polarizing factors, such as ethnicity, race and religion – which are more prevalent in developing countries – and social media has not received sufficient attention. This study offers insights into an understudied topic and significantly contributes to social media polarization literature
Ethnic group · Mediation · Moderated mediation · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political science · Social science · Sociology · Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Social media in higher education
Incivility on Facebook and political polarization
Why people use social media
Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups
Incidental exposure to news
Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook
Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys
Exposure to opposing views on social media can increase political polarization
Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling
Retracted Article
Political participation of Afghan Youths on Facebook
Hearing and speaking the other side
Learning from disagreement on social media
What makes people more polarized? The effects of anonymity, being with like-minded others, and the moderating role of need for approval
Actual and perceived polarization on independence-unification views in Taiwan
Polarization and social media
Do not blame it on the algorithm
Facebook news and (de)polarization
Social Media, Network Heterogeneity, and Opinion Polarization
Polarization and Partisan Selective Exposure
The role of (social) media in political polarization
Racism, Hate Speech, and Social Media
The Polarizing Effects of Online Partisan Criticism
Can we blame social media for polarization? Counter-evidence against filter bubble claims during the Covid-19 pandemic
Accidental exposure to politics on social media as online participation equalizer in Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom
The Contradictory Influence of Social Media Affordances on Online Communal Knowledge Sharing
When debates break apart
How Cross-Cutting News Exposure Relates to Candidate Issue Stance Knowledge, Political Polarization, and Participation
Partial, conditional, and moderated moderated mediation
The Decline of the Pashtuns in Afghanistan
Effects of network heterogeneity on social media on opinion polarization among South Koreans
The Workplace as a Context for Cross-Cutting Political Discourse
Intergroup contact reduces affective polarization but not among strong party identifiers
Political Polarization on the Digital Sphere
The state, identity politics and ethnic boundaries in Afghanistan
Hybrid Extremism
The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States
Affect, Not Ideology
The Political Nature of Ideological Polarization
Affective polarization in multiparty systems
Contact hypothesis in ethnic relations
The Dynamics of Political Incivility on Twitter
Perceiving Affective Polarization in the United States
Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |