A Pandemic of Possibilities
The Spread of Potentiality-Seeking Organisations under Conditions of the Covid-19 Lockdown
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6437434 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Niels Åkerstrøm Andersen (0000-0002-5731-740X, Copenhagen Business School), G Carli (0000-0001-9406-589X, The Open University), Paul Stenner (0000-0003-4505-6422, The Open University), Maria Rita Tagliaventi (0000-0002-3924-2029, University of Bologna) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 187-210 |
| Publication date | 2025-03-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Organizational Sociology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2752-2997 • E-ISSN: 2752-2997 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/joso-2023-0030 |
| OpenAlex | W4408694070 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 27 |
The premise of this paper is that an adequate understanding of the impact the pandemic had upon society presupposes an adequate theory of society. This must include a theory of the various systems and organisations that compose society and that were impacted by the pandemic and are shaping its aftermath. This paper adopts and adapts Luhmann’s autopoietic systems theory to provide a ‘frame’ for understanding key societal reactions to the Covid-19 pandemic and the subsequent pathways opening up, especially for organisations. In Part 1 we introduce core elements of Luhmann’s systems theory. In Part 2 we illustrate how the Pandemic crisis has accelerated a transformation in the way organisations couple with other social systems. Two aspects of this change have significant implications for how time is managed and understood. First, as formal contracts give way to partnerships (promises of later promises) ever greater emphasis is placed on a ‘future future’. Second, this constitutes a shift towards ‘potentialising organisations’ characterised by what we call ‘operational coupling’ as distinct from ‘structural coupling’. We conclude by suggesting that potentiality-seeking organisations introduce a new paradox. They pursue opportunities stemming from learning to ‘expect the unexpected’, while still calling on function systems to stabilize expectations
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Business · Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19 · Outbreak · Pandemic · Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2 · Higher Education Governance and Development · Management and Organizational Studies · Medicine · Virology
Psychology without Foundations
Organization and Decision
The worry conversation
From self-evident norms to contingent couplings
System as Difference
Niklas Luhmann
Is Autopoietic Systems Theory Alexithymic? Luhmann and the Socio-Psychology of Emotions
Fuzzy‐logical self‐organisation system modelling—Illustrating case of self‐organisation Czech restaurants during the Covid‐19 pandemic
Potentialization
The Constitution of Non-Monetary Surplus Values
Contracting Worlds
Human Rights and Modern Society
Organizations as Distinction Generating and Processing Systems
Emergence of a potentialising organisation in University self-governance
The institutional logics of love
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |