Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Holistic Organizational Analysis – the Pentagon Model

Bibliographic Data

ID6437442
AuthorsPer Morten Schiefloe (0000-0001-8734-281X, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume3
Issue3
Pages507-537
Publication date2025-12-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Organizational Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2752-2997 • E-ISSN: 2752-2997
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/joso-2024-0032
OpenAlexW4416951106
LanguageEN
References cited32

Our “Beacons of Organizational Sociology” series makes available, through essays or first-time translations, concepts and texts that have shaped debates in organizational sociology in non-English-speaking countries or presents reflections on such debates by established scholars. The second text in this series presents a model for holistic organizational analysis, named The Pentagon Model . The model is developed in Norway and has, during the last two decades, been successfully applied in many research projects, both basic and applied, and in different kinds of organizations. The model has also proved to be well-suited for educational purposes and for the dissemination of research-based findings. The model builds on established organization theories and rests on a basic argument that most organizational issues concerning qualities and capabilities can be fruitfully sorted into five interdependent categories: formal structure, technology, culture, interaction, and social relations and networks. This taxonomy can be used both as guidelines for data collection by qualitative or quantitative methods and for sorting findings into corresponding groups of variables. The model has proved to be widely applicable and can be used for studying phenomena on different organizational levels: individual, collective, system and ecological. It can also be used with different time perspectives: to explain things that happened in the past, to describe present-day situations, and to point to upcoming challenges and future possibilities

  • Organizational Culture

    Joanne Martin•Organizational Culture•2002

  • Coordination in Organizations

    Gerardo A Okhuysen, Beth A Bechky•Academy of Management Annals•2009

  • Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices

    Carrie Leana, Carrie R Leana et al.•Academy of Management Review•1999

  • Sociomaterial Practices

    Open Access•Wanda J Orlikowski•Organization Studies•2007

  • The interdisciplinary study of coordination

    Open Access•Thomas W Malone, Kevin Crowston•ACM Computing Surveys•1994

  • Affect- And Cognition-Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations.

    Daniel J McAllister•Academy of Management Journal•1995

  • Bowling alone

    Open Access•Robert D Putnam•Proceedings of the 2000 ACM…•2000

  • Not So Different After All

    Denise M Rousseau, Sim B Sitkin et al.•Academy of Management Review•1998

  • Towards Collaborative Community

    Paul S Adler, Charles Heckscher•The firm as a collaborative…•2006

  • Organization outside organizations

    Open Access•Göran Ahrne, Nils Brunsson•Organization•2011

  • Brokerage and Closure

    R S Burt•Brokerage and Closure•2005

  • Resilience in care organisations

    Open Access•Kati Orru, Kristi Nero et al.•Disasters•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae