Safety net of last resort
The evolution, determinants and adequacy of Dutch minimum income support
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6437940 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Benedikt Goderis (0000-0001-8980-9479, Netherlands Institute for Social Research, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 8-29 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Poverty and Social Justice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1759-8273 • E-ISSN: 1759-8281 |
| Publisher | Policy Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1332/17598273y2024d000000033 |
| OpenAlex | W4405014681 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 11 |
Dutch minimum income support provides a generous social safety net compared to most other European Union (EU) member states but has not been able to structurally reduce poverty. This inadequacy did not come about overnight but is the result of six decades of policy decisions. In this article, we aim to explain the current income shortfalls of people on minimum income support by studying the historical evolution and determinants of the Dutch minimum income scheme. We demonstrate that it has on average maintained a constant level of purchasing power over the period 1980–2023. This fits well with the notion that poverty is of an absolute nature, and that a social minimum should guarantee a stable level of purchasing power. It fits less well with relative or contextual approaches to poverty, and the view that a social minimum should adapt to changing norms when a society grows richer. To uncover the reasons for the growing gap between general prosperity and the minimum income benefit, we decompose it into smaller gaps by illustrating the evolution of prosperity, labour productivity, gross wages, collectively agreed wages, the minimum wage and the minimum income benefit. We show that each of these gaps matters and argue that this provides valuable insights into the structural, institutional and political forces that have shaped Dutch minimum income support since its introduction in 1965. Based on these results, we argue against the current ad hoc measures of the government and in favour of a more structural approach to supporting low-income households
Business · Economics · Environmental health · Net (polyhedron · Net income · Public economics · Safety net · Education in Diverse Contexts · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Mathematics · Medicine · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Finance
How Politics and Institutions Shape Poverty and Inequality
The Oxford Handbook of the Social Science of Poverty
A Sociological Approach to the Measurement of Poverty
Poor, Relatively Speaking
The political economy of social assistance and minimum income benefits
A glass ceiling on poverty reduction? An empirical investigation into the structural constraints on minimum income protections
The three worlds of welfare capitalism
Who should get what, and why? On deservingness criteria and the conditionality of solidarity among the public
Why is it So Hard to Reach the EU's Poverty Target
Overcoming path dependency
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |