Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Hate prompts participation

Examining the dynamic relationship between affective polarization and political participation

Bibliographic Data

ID6443561
AuthorsSangwon Lee (0000-0003-2471-8079, New Mexico State University), Jihyang Choi (0000-0001-9898-3401, Ewha Womans University, Republic of Korea, corresponding author), Chloe Ahn (0000-0003-1390-5215, University of Pennsylvania)
Year2023
Volume27
Issue1
Pages443-461
Publication date2023-06-05
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNew Media & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1461-4448 • E-ISSN: 1461-7315
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/14614448231177301
OpenAlexW4379389225
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited57

Political participation has long been considered a cornerstone of democracy. While most studies on political participation have been grounded on a normative approach, which assumes that political participation is driven by positive civic actions, recent studies suggest that political participation is also driven by negative forces such as overconfidence in knowledge and partisan communication flows. This article builds on the latter line of research by exploring the role of affective polarization on political participation. While this line of research is not new, it suffers from a lack of clear causal order. This study relies on three-wave panel data collected during the 2022 Korean presidential election. To ensure methodological rigor, we utilized both cross-lagged and fixed-effects panel analyses. Our findings show that affective polarization stimulates political participation rather than the reverse path. In addition, we did not observe a reciprocal relationship. Implications for democracy are discussed

Cornerstone · Democracy · Economics · Normative · Panel data · Panel survey · Polarization (electrochemistry · Political communication · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Survey data collection · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Psychology · Social and Cultural Dynamics · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Party membership motivations and political activism in a polarized new democracy

    Open Access•Gi‐woo Roh, Jungsub Shin•Party Politics•2026

  • Measuring affective polarization

    Open Access•James N Druckman, Samara Klar et al.•Political Psychology•2026

  • Privacy Divide

    Open Access•Hongjin Shim, Sohye Lim•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2026

  • How Political Overconfidence Fuels Affective Polarization in Cross-cutting Discussions

    Open Access•Han Lin, Yonghwan Kim•Communication Research•2026

  • Digital Discourse and Polarization

    Open Access•Taisik Hwang, Sooyoung Shin•Social Sciences•2026

  • From political news consumption to political participation

    Open Access•Andrej Kirbiš, Maruša Lubej et al.•International Journal of Sociology•2026

  • The Impact of Affective Polarization on Political Participation

    Open Access•Maruša Lubej, Martin Dolezal et al.•Political Studies•2025

  • This is why we can’t have nice things

    Eliana Dubosar, Brittany Shaughnessy et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2025

  • Effects of National Voting Experience During High School on Political Participation

    Open Access•Hoyong Jung, Sangwon Lee•Social Science Quarterly•2025

  • Territorial disputes and affective polarization

    Open Access•Laia Bacell I Ventura, Laia Balcells et al.•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • Incidental and intentional exposure in a mock election setting on social media

    Open Access•Jana H Dreston, Andreas Nanz•Human Communication Research•2025

  • A New Measure of Affective Polarization

    Open Access•Nuno Campos, Celso Federico•American Political Science Review•2025

  • A Self-Righteous, Not a Virtuous, Circle

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, Sebastián Valenzuela•Social Media + Society•2024

  • Participation in America

    Norman H Nie, Sidney Verba•Participation in America•1987

  • A Virtuous Circle

    Open Access•P Norris•Virtuous Circle•2000

  • Fixed Effects Regression Models

    P D Allison, Paul Allison•Fixed Effects Regression Models•2009

  • Self-perception

    Daryl J Bem•Psychological Review•1967

  • Information and Expression in a Digital Age

    Open Access•Dhavan V Shah, Jaeho Cho et al.•Communication Research•2005

  • Shared Emotion

    A Hasell•Digital Journalism•2021

  • Facebook news and (de)polarization

    Michael A Beam, Myiah J Hutchens et al.•Information Communication & Society•2018

  • Alienation, Aggression, and Sensation Seeking as Predictors of Adolescent Use of Violent Film, Computer, and Website Content

    Open Access•Michael D Slater•Journal of Communication•2003

  • Direct and Differential Effects of the Internet on Political and Civic Engagement

    Open Access•Michael A Xenos, Michael Xenos et al.•Journal of Communication•2007

  • Democracies Divided

    Thomas Carothers, Andrew O’Donohue•Democracies Divided•2019

  • Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions

    Open Access•Brian E Weeks•Journal of Communication•2015

  • The Civic Culture

    Gabriel Almond, Gabriel Abraham Almond et al.•Civic Culture•1963

  • Dark Participation

    Open Access•Thorsten Quandt•Media and Communication•2018

  • Radical American Partisanship

    Nathan P Kalmoe, L Mason•Radical American Partisanship•2022

  • Hearing the Other Side

    Open Access•Diana C Mutz•Hearing the Other Side•2006

  • Rethinking the Virtuous Circle Hypothesis on Social Media

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, Trevor Diehl et al.•Human Communication Research•2021

  • Breaking the “Virtuous Circle”

    Open Access•J Suk, Dhavan V Shah et al.•Human Communication Research•2021

  • Political Comedy as a Gateway to News Use, Internal Efficacy, and Participation

    Open Access•J A Long, Min Seon Jeong et al.•Human Communication Research•2021

  • How negative partisanship affects voting behavior in Europe

    Open Access•Sabrina Jasmin Mayer•Research & Politics•2017

  • Social Media News Use and Political Cynicism

    Open Access•Hyunjin Song, Homero Gil De Zúñiga et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2019

  • The Effects of Strategic News on Political Cynicism, Issue Evaluations, and Policy Support

    Claes H De Vreese•Mass Communication & Society•2004

  • Cynical Nonpartisans

    Open Access•Sangwon Lee, M Jones-Jang•New Media & Society•2022

  • Implications of online incidental and selective exposure for political emotions

    Open Access•Qinfeng Zhu, Brian E Weeks et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • Reinforcing Spirals

    Open Access•Michael D Slater•Communication Theory•2007

  • Polarizing Communication as Media Effects on Antagonists. Understanding Communication in Conflicts in Digital Media Societies1

    Open Access•Senja Post•Communication Theory•2018

  • Reinforcing spirals of political discussion and affective polarization

    Myiah J Hutchens, Jay D Hmielowski et al.•Communication Monographs•2019

  • Voice and Equality

    Henry Brady, Sidney Verba et al.•Voice and Equality•1995

  • Strategy News Is Good News

    Alon Zoizner, Shaul Shenhav et al.•Political Communication•2021

  • Community, Communication, and Participation

    Jack M Mcleod, Dietram A Scheufele et al.•Political Communication•1999

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Does affective polarisation increase turnout? Evidence from Germany, The Netherlands and Spain

    Open Access•Eelco Harteveld, Markus Wagner•West European Politics•2023

  • Election Night’s Alright for Fighting

    Nicholas A Valentino, Ted Brader et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • How Affective Polarization Undermines Support for Democratic Norms

    Open Access•Jon Kingzette, James N Druckman et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Inequalities in Non-Institutionalised forms of Political Participation

    Open Access•Sofie Marien, Marc Hooghe et al.•Political Studies•2010

  • Emotional Rescue

    Open Access•Eric Groenendyk, Eric W Groenendyk et al.•Political Psychology•2014

  • The Strengthening of Partisan Affect

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Political Psychology•2018

  • News Media Use and Political Engagement Among Adolescents

    Open Access•Sanne Kruikemeier, Adam Shehata•Political Communication•2017

  • The political consequences of alienation-based and indifference-based voter abstention

    Open Access•James Adams, James E Adams et al.•Political Behavior•2006

  • Testing the Reciprocal Effects of Campaign Participation

    Open Access•Ryan L Claassen•Political Behavior•2008

  • Turnout in Electoral Democracies

    Open Access•André Blais, Agnieszka Dobrzynska•European Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Forgotten Side of Partisanship

    Open Access•Mike Medeiros, Alain Noël•Comparative Political Studies•2014

  • The Power of the Dark Side

    Open Access•Nicholas J Caruana, R Michael Mcgregor et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2015

  • Does Affective Polarization Undermine Democratic Norms or Accountability? Maybe Not

    Open Access•David E Broockman, Joshua L Kalla et al.•American Journal of Political…•2023

  • Fear and Loathing across Party Lines

    Open Access•Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•American Journal of Political…•2015

  • Televised Exposure to Politics

    Open Access•Susanna Dilliplane, Seth K Goldman et al.•American Journal of Political…•2013

  • Divided by the Vote

    Open Access•Sara B Hobolt, Thomas J Leeper et al.•British Journal of Political…•2021

  • Fear, anger, and risk

    Jennifer S Lerner, Dacher Keltner•Journal of Personality and Social…•2001

  • The Origins and Consequences of Affective Polarization in the United States

    Sharad Iyengar, Yphtach Lelkes et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2018

  • Affect, Not Ideology

    Sharad Iyengar, Shanto Iyengar et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Affective polarization in multiparty systems

    Open Access•Markus Wagner•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Affective polarization and the salience of elections

    Open Access•Enrique Hernández, Eva Anduiza et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Expressive Partisanship

    Open Access•Leonie Huddy, L Mason et al.•American Political Science Review•2015

  • Maximum Likelihood for Cross-lagged Panel Models with Fixed Effects

    Open Access•P D Allison, Richard Williams et al.•Socius Sociological Research for…•2017

  • Implications of Pro- and Counterattitudinal Information Exposure for Affective Polarization

    Open Access•R Kelly Garrett, Shira Dvir Gvirsman et al.•Human Communication Research•2014

Unique citing works13
Citations per year6,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae