Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sterilization, Infecundity, and Reproductive Autonomy in Rural, Suburban, and Urban America

Results From a National Survey

Bibliographic Data

ID6444895
AuthorsShelley Clark (0000-0002-6783-8743, McGill University, corresponding author), Zoe Levy (McGill University)
Year2025
Volume57
Issue1
Pages72-84
Publication date2025-03-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePerspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1538-6341 • E-ISSN: 1931-2393
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psrh.70006
PMID40090703
OpenAlexW4408493527
LanguageEN
References cited56

Objective Rural women are significantly more likely than urban women to be sterilized. This study aims to understand why rural women depend so heavily on this method of fertility control, whether they are more likely than suburban and urban women to desire sterilization reversal, and the impact of female sterilization on rural women's ability to achieve their fertility goals. Methods Data from 10,081 sexually active women aged 15 to 49, who participated in the National Survey of Family Growth (2015–2019), were analyzed using binary and multinomial logistic regression analyses. Unadjusted and adjusted predicted probabilities were calculated to estimate the prevalence of (1) female sterilization, (2) desire for sterilization reversal or wanting a(nother) child if sterilized, and (3) unwanted infecundity among rural, suburban, and urban women. Results Rural women (24.2%) are substantially more likely than suburban (15.3%) or urban (13.9%) women to receive tubal ligation. These disparities are not explained by women's demographic, reproductive, religious, and socioeconomic characteristics. Rural women who are sterilized are not more likely than suburban or urban women to desire sterilization reversal or to want to have (more) children. However, because more rural women rely on tubal ligation, a significantly higher fraction of rural women (34.8%) than urban women (23.8%) who want to have a(nother) child are infecund. Roughly, 40% of infecund rural women who wish to conceive had tubal ligation. Conclusions Limited contraceptive choice undermines rural women's ability to conceive wanted births. These results highlight another important reason for expanded reproductive health care in rural America

Business · Environmental health · Family planning · Fertility · Geography · Logistic regression · Population · Research methodology · Rural area · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Sterilization (economics · Tubal ligation · Demography · Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions · Medicine · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • What Is Rural? Challenges And Implications Of Definitions That Inadequately Encompass Rural People And Places

    Kevin J Bennett, Tyrone F Borders et al.•Health Affairs•2019

  • Contraceptive method use in the United States

    Open Access•Megan L Kavanaugh, Jenna Jerman•Contraception•2018

  • Dobbs

    Open Access•Andrzej Kulczycki•Health Education & Behavior•2022

  • Reproductive Autonomy Is Nonnegotiable, Even in the Time of Covid-19

    Senderowicz Senderowicz, Higgins Higgins•International Perspectives on…•2020

  • Availability of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraception in Kansas Health Departments

    Open Access•Tawana Evans, Megha Ramaswamy et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2018

  • Urban‐Rural Differences in Tubal Ligation Incidence in the State of Georgia, USA

    Open Access•Curtis D Travers, Curtis Travers et al.•The Journal of Rural Health•2018

  • Changes in Permanent Contraception Procedures Among Young Adults Following the Dobbs Decision

    Open Access•Jacqueline Ellison, Jacqueline E Ellison et al.•JAMA Health Forum•2024

  • Postpartum Contraception Use by Urban/Rural Status

    Open Access•Katherine Starr, Katherine A Starr et al.•Women s Health Issues•2015

  • Contraceptive Method Use by Rural–Urban Residence among Women and Men in the United States, 2006 to 2017

    Open Access•Jaclyn A Janis, Katherine A Ahrens et al.•Women s Health Issues•2021

  • Interest in Over-the-Counter Access to a Progestin-Only Pill among Women in the United States

    Open Access•Kate Grindlay, Daniel Grossman•Women s Health Issues•2018

  • Geographic Variation in Characteristics of Postpartum Women Using Female Sterilization

    Open Access•Kari White, J E Potter et al.•Women s Health Issues•2015

  • Desire for Sterilization Reversal Among U.S. Females

    Open Access•Mieke Cw Eeckhaut, Megan M Sweeney et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2018

  • Women or Larc First? Reproductive Autonomy And the Promotion of Long‐Acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods

    Open Access•Anne M Gomez, Liza Fuentes et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2014

  • Changing Educational Differentials in Female Sterilization

    Open Access•Sarah R Hayford, Alexandra Kissling et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2020

  • Differences in Family Planning Services by Rural–urban Geography

    Open Access•Summer L Martins, Katherine Starr et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2016

  • Rural–Urban Disparities in Pregnancy Intentions, Births, and Abortions Among US Adolescent and Young Women, 1995–2017

    April Sutton, D T Lichter et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2019

  • Adolescent Birth Rates and Rural–Urban Differences by Levels of Deprivation and Health Professional Shortage Areas in the United States, 2017–2018

    Sylvester Olubolu Orimaye, Nathan Hale et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2021

  • Are Rural Areas Holdouts in the Second Demographic Transition? Evidence From Canada and the United States

    Open Access•Shelley Clark, Matthew M Brooks et al.•Demography•2024

  • The evolution of fertility expectations over the life course

    Open Access•Sarah R Hayford•Demography•2009

  • Patterns of Contraceptive Use in the United States

    Calvin Goldscheider, William D Mosher•Studies in Family Planning•1991

  • Religious Preference, Religious Participation, and Sterilization Decisions

    Kenneth W Eckhardt, Gerry E Hendershot•Review of Religious Research•1984

  • Female sterilization in the life course

    Open Access•Sara Johnsen, Megan Sweeney•Demographic Research•2022

  • Early Family Formation, Selective Migration, and Childhood Conditions in Rural America☆

    Open Access•Matthew M Brooks, Shelley Clark•Rural Sociology•2024

  • Understanding Sterilization Regret in the United States

    Open Access•Mieke C W Eeckhaut, Mieke Cw Eeckhaut et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2018

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae