From benign to malign
Unintended consequences and the growth of Zombie policies
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 6445211 |
|---|---|
| Authors | B Guy Peters (0000-0001-9143-7547, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh), Maximilian Lennart Nagel (0000-0002-4614-9877, Professorship Public Policy and Public Administration, Helmut-Schmidt-University Hamburg , Hamburg 20144) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 136-149 |
| Publication date | 2025-01-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Policy and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1449-4035 • E-ISSN: 1839-3373 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/polsoc/puae039 |
| OpenAlex | W4406665219 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 39 |
Few policymakers initiate policies that they know are malign, and are contrary to the public interest. Well-intentioned policies may, however, have unintended consequences that over time do make them, at least in part, malign. These policies may continue to produce some positive results for society, but they may also have significant negative consequences. Further, given that the malign nature of the policy tends to benefit powerful political and economic interests, once the malign aspects of the policy begin to manifest themselves, they tend to persist. This paper will use four mini-cases to understand better the transition from benign to malign policies. Two of the cases come from the United States and two come from Germany. Two cases will be in health policy, one in infrastructure, and one in crisis management policies. In all four cases policies that have over time began to demonstrate negative features continue to be implemented because of the benefits that they create for some interests in society–interests other than the original targets of the programs. In addition to the emerging literature on malign policies, this paper will have relevance for the large literature on unintended consequences (beginning with Merton in 1936), as well as the literature on Zombie ideas and failed policy ideas
Computer security · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Sociology · Unintended consequences · Zombie · Computer Science · HIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk · Homelessness and Social Issues · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Law · Public Administration
Causality in Policy Studies
Policy Problems and Policy Design
Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap
When complexity science meets implementation science
Public Policy and Program Evaluation
Zombie Ideas
Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap
Patient‐Satisfaction Surveys on a Scale of 0 to 10
Waiting times for elective treatments according to insurance status
Decision makers’ preferences of policy instruments
Transparency
The perverse impact of performance measures on policing
The Epistemic Community
Does Test Preparation Mean Low-Quality Instruction
Multi-level responses to Covid-19
Behavioral Assumptions of Policy Tools
Policy Alienation of Public Professionals
Gaming in Targetworld
Policy Success, Policy Failure and Grey Areas In-Between
Hidden agendas
The use of placebo policies to escape from policy traps
When Policies Undo Themselves
The Unanticipated Consequences of Purposive Social Action
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Unintended Consequences
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |